From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 117636 invoked by alias); 30 Jan 2019 22:02:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 117627 invoked by uid 89); 30 Jan 2019 22:02:46 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: smtprelay.synopsys.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=synopsys.com; s=mail; t=1548885762; bh=EGTJnbMvl9T6BAcf8zhbElbbHbp7RHiZ0COlnRpFK+k=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=IKENzRCVuNbF1LuK43iB8Cw6sIa3QnMk8a1dYzk8g/cduLhKiLMhmSSHTCXPC7bke DaPhNJQxvOnDjbFwKCFRsoWqX+ly9N/VbiEgFPtfdD5Q03Dy2SQisjbPIgOFWgLIG7 MwV9J7sQW5KthEOULZQq42gm+xDqJ2YAbRL4gQwYpNpi7vYYp0qkOxPFrfqtMC4Hxj kUpyk9kXrov1H7AitRq8cT8rKXvQRfWFWfQZMEE5WpZsErXNWu1Ys04Ztr6hsswrP7 b0SK+6mH7xvYIWOVGurZTc3ZREYCl0G9hH3UP/2IZPHwGZHelBfUFv/EU2TvObGC+b jt8nBbEcb46vw== Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/15] ARC: Atomics and Locking primitives To: Joseph Myers CC: Andreas Schwab , , Newsgroups: gmane.linux.kernel.arc,gmane.comp.lib.glibc.alpha References: <1548811555-24373-1-git-send-email-vgupta@synopsys.com> <1548811555-24373-6-git-send-email-vgupta@synopsys.com> From: Vineet Gupta Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Message-ID: <1ca8778a-984f-bbf3-aa84-ab324c200914@synopsys.com> Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 22:02:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2019-01/txt/msg00705.txt.bz2 On 1/30/19 1:50 PM, Joseph Myers wrote: >>> This seems like something that could be a common issue for new ports, so >>> worth a mention at alongside >>> such things as using init_array and USE_ATOMIC_COMPILER_BUILTINS. >> Updated wiki page ! > Now it's saying those macros are in atomic-machine.h. That's not right; > the information about those macros needs to go in a separate paragraph. Does it look any better now ?