public inbox for libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
To: Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>
Cc: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>, libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v2] Add reallocarray function.
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 20:47:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140520170126.GY507@brightrain.aerifal.cx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <537B7849.1010208@cs.ucla.edu>

On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 08:44:09AM -0700, Paul Eggert wrote:
> Andreas Schwab wrote:
> >Please report that as a gcc bug (it doesn't mark it either).
> 
> As far as I can tell this is a bug in GCC's documentation, not in
> its implementation.  As I mentioned cryptically in my previous
> message, if FOO has the malloc attribute and you execute 'int **p =
> foo (...);', the malloc attribute means that *P cannot point to
> previously-existing storage (because *P is uninitialized junk).
> That is why the attribute applies to calloc (because *P must be
> null, which also cannot point to previously-existing storage) but
> not to realloc (because *P might be initialized and might point to
> previously-existing storage).
> 
> For more about this confusing topic, please see:
> 
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56955

What is the issue about "previously-existing storage"? Is the concern
that *new->something might alias new (because new==old happens to be
true and the object contained a pointer to itself or part of itself)
or that *new->something merely can alias other existing memory
(whereas GCC assumes it never can)?

Rich

  reply	other threads:[~2014-05-20 17:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-18 21:05 [RFC][PATCH] " Rüdiger Sonderfeld
2014-05-18 21:43 ` Paul Eggert
2014-05-18 21:50   ` [RFC][PATCH v2] " Rüdiger Sonderfeld
2014-05-19  4:27     ` Rüdiger Sonderfeld
2014-05-19 15:30     ` Joseph S. Myers
2014-05-20  4:35       ` Rich Felker
2014-05-20  8:17         ` Paul Eggert
2014-05-20  8:19         ` Andreas Schwab
2014-05-20 15:45           ` Paul Eggert
2014-05-20 20:47             ` Rich Felker [this message]
2014-05-20 20:56               ` Paul Eggert
2014-05-20 12:50       ` Rüdiger Sonderfeld
2014-05-20 14:18         ` Paul Eggert
2014-05-21 12:39           ` Rüdiger Sonderfeld
2014-05-22  5:45             ` Paul Eggert
2014-09-01 15:48 ` [RFC][PATCH] " Florian Weimer
2014-09-01 17:24   ` Rich Felker
2014-09-02  9:29     ` Florian Weimer
2014-09-02 13:03       ` Rich Felker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140520170126.GY507@brightrain.aerifal.cx \
    --to=dalias@libc.org \
    --cc=eggert@cs.ucla.edu \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=schwab@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).