From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-alpha-return-68963-listarch-libc-alpha=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 100416 invoked by alias); 18 Apr 2016 20:03:05 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-alpha-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 100382 invoked by uid 89); 18 Apr 2016 20:03:05 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:257
X-HELO: smtp.gentoo.org
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 20:03:00 -0000
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
To: Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@ubuntu.com>
Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] linux ttyname_r: return link if appropriate
Message-ID: <20160418200300.GZ5369@vapier.lan>
Mail-Followup-To: Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@ubuntu.com>,
	libc-alpha@sourceware.org
References: <20160415152929.GA7932@ubuntumail>
 <5711165D.5040902@redhat.com>
 <20160415164652.GE8450@ubuntumail>
 <57111F9C.8030902@redhat.com>
 <20160415174245.GA9610@ubuntumail>
 <20160415184746.GA10830@ubuntumail>
 <20160415195938.GP6588@vapier.lan>
 <20160418195349.GC30476@ubuntumail>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tAdHiH28s3ybHVSb"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160418195349.GC30476@ubuntumail>
X-SW-Source: 2016-04/txt/msg00449.txt.bz2


--tAdHiH28s3ybHVSb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-length: 196

On 18 Apr 2016 19:53, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Same as previous commit for ttyname

i think it's preferable to squash it into the previous commit.
it's not like we'd merge one w/out the other.
-mike

--tAdHiH28s3ybHVSb
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-length: 819

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=k4Ao
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--tAdHiH28s3ybHVSb--