From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25585 invoked by alias); 8 Sep 2017 19:19:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 25572 invoked by uid 89); 8 Sep 2017 19:19:35 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,URIBL_RED autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: smtp6-g21.free.fr Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2017 19:19:00 -0000 From: Albert ARIBAUD To: Joseph Myers Cc: Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/52] Make GLIBC Y2038-proof Message-ID: <20170908211927.4f46a7f7.albert.aribaud@3adev.fr> In-Reply-To: References: <20170907224219.12483-1-albert.aribaud@3adev.fr> <20170908190832.03476c79.albert.aribaud@3adev.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2017-09/txt/msg00401.txt.bz2 Hi Joseph, On Fri, 8 Sep 2017 17:26:26 +0000, Joseph Myers wrote : > On Fri, 8 Sep 2017, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > > > > * Documentation of _TIME_BITS is clearly needed. > > > > Where should this documentation go? > > In manual/creature.texi, alongside the documentation of _FILE_OFFSET_BITS. Thanks, will do in 01/52 of v2. > (It occurred to me that patches 50-52 don't seem to have reached the > mailing list, so I don't know what was in them.) You're correct. I did not get any NDR so I cannot tell what happened... I have sent the rest (threaded properly after 49/52, although missing "References:" headers to 0/48 and previous). Cordialement, Albert ARIBAUD 3ADEV