From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17548 invoked by alias); 9 Oct 2017 14:10:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 17520 invoked by uid 89); 9 Oct 2017 14:10:35 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*r:172.16.2, gabriel, Gabriel, Hx-languages-length:860 X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 3 recipients X-HELO: mo19.mail-out.ovh.net Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2017 14:10:00 -0000 From: "Gabriel F. T. Gomes" To: Florian Weimer CC: , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] Fixes for gcc enabling -mfloat128 by default Message-ID: <20171009111020.2aac888f@keller> In-Reply-To: <2cbba550-fed1-4b66-d438-f0cd1dcc393b@redhat.com> References: <20170912123435.6592-1-gabriel@inconstante.eti.br> <20170921183123.48a82e7c@keller.br.ibm.com> <2cbba550-fed1-4b66-d438-f0cd1dcc393b@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ClientProxiedBy: EX1.emp.local (172.16.2.1) To EX1.emp.local (172.16.2.1) X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 9464033145494752916 X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK X-VR-SPAMSCORE: -100 X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrfeelledrleelgdehkecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfqggfjpdevjffgvefmvefgnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd X-SW-Source: 2017-10/txt/msg00364.txt.bz2 Thanks, Tulio, Florian... My plan is to apply these patches to release/2.26/master today. On Tue, 26 Sep 2017, Florian Weimer wrote: >On 09/21/2017 11:31 PM, Gabriel F. T. Gomes wrote: >> Thanks for all the reviews in this patch set. >> I just pushed them. >> >> I need to backport these patches to ibm/2.26/master. Usually, I backport >> the patches to release/2.26/master first, then merge into ibm/2.26/master. >> >> Is it fine to backport the patches to release/2.26/master, this time? Even >> if they do not fix bugs in bugzilla? I believe it could benefit other >> distros. > >If I understand our situation correctly, we want these patches in Fedora >27, so backporting them to the stable release branch would be helpful >(so that we'll pick them up automatically). > >Thanks, >Florian