From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 56435 invoked by alias); 3 Apr 2018 21:08:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 56312 invoked by uid 89); 3 Apr 2018 21:08:00 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: hera.aquilenet.fr Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2018 21:08:00 -0000 From: Samuel Thibault To: "H.J. Lu" Cc: Andreas Schwab , GNU C Library Subject: Re: [hurd,commited] hurd: Avoid more libc.so local PLTs Message-ID: <20180403210755.rbbjx7mou47mp3er@var.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr> References: <20180403003817.21337-1-samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org> <20180403082029.g3bfw4upbti67wwz@var.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) X-SW-Source: 2018-04/txt/msg00077.txt.bz2 Hello, H.J. Lu, on mar. 03 avril 2018 12:26:33 -0700, wrote: > __libc_longjmp and __libc_siglongjmp are private external functions provided for > libpthread. They should never be called inside libc. I'm sorry for asking, but are these conventions documented somewhere? These look like magic to me otherwise: why shouldn't they ever be called from libc? Samuel