From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 77916 invoked by alias); 16 Jun 2018 01:13:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 77905 invoked by uid 89); 16 Jun 2018 01:13:57 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,PLING_QUERY,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: hera.aquilenet.fr Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2018 01:13:00 -0000 From: Samuel Thibault To: libc-alpha@sourceware.org Subject: hurd: missing some PLT refs?! Message-ID: <20180616011353.vcrydpiz3rpsxc2o@var.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) X-SW-Source: 2018-06/txt/msg00454.txt.bz2 Hello, check-localplt currently emits: Missing required PLT reference: libc.so: free Missing required PLT reference: libc.so: malloc Missing required PLT reference: ld.so: free but there are PLT references in libc.so, e.g.: ./stdlib/exit.os: 0000017b R_386_PLT32 free so I don't understand why check-localplt doesn't see them. Any idea? Samuel