From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 99406 invoked by alias); 28 Jun 2018 09:52:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 99301 invoked by uid 89); 28 Jun 2018 09:52:14 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-25.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,GIT_PATCH_0,GIT_PATCH_1,GIT_PATCH_2,GIT_PATCH_3,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*Ad:D*panix.com X-HELO: vmicros1.altlinux.org Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 09:52:00 -0000 From: "Dmitry V. Levin" To: Florian Weimer Cc: Zack Weinberg , GNU C Library Subject: Re: [PATCH] time: Define _STRUCT_TIMESPEC in Message-ID: <20180628095209.GA10666@altlinux.org> Mail-Followup-To: Florian Weimer , Zack Weinberg , GNU C Library References: <20180621064654.2D7DA4289B0D0@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> <21e4d5b7-f883-4722-0dcc-5e4228720fac@redhat.com> <3e6d8dfb-1947-bfae-4ee4-40918718187f@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="zhXaljGHf11kAtnf" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3e6d8dfb-1947-bfae-4ee4-40918718187f@redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2018-06/txt/msg00875.txt.bz2 --zhXaljGHf11kAtnf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 736 On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 10:27:53AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 06/21/2018 01:24 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: > > diff --git a/time/bits/types/struct_timespec.h b/time/bits/types/struct= _timespec.h > > index 644db9fdb6..5b77c52b4f 100644 > > --- a/time/bits/types/struct_timespec.h > > +++ b/time/bits/types/struct_timespec.h > > @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ > > -#ifndef __timespec_defined > > -#define __timespec_defined 1 > > +/* NB: Include guard matches what uses. */ > > +#ifndef _STRUCT_TIMESPEC > > +#define _STRUCT_TIMESPEC 1 >=20 > Are there any objections to this change? It's required to fix a GCC=20 > build failure, so I'm going to commit this soon (probably on Friday). The change looks fine, thanks. --=20 ldv --zhXaljGHf11kAtnf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-length: 801 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJbNK/JAAoJEAVFT+BVnCUIxN4P/3aBbJJ8SofKTKI85KQU/6ot VP95TbRAPavbpywE2typV4c5gym94hEFvZjeGRInr8UtRIQJK6W8hBdAhdaHsbHR 6i02/HOttvOkxOvXoiuCevz3FlgD9G5SFX4jJW7IW1/NyEgqoY1lBF9ontARGJ05 19wWJ2iaCBhRxVzAwmuQOPh/3q5Zj4uKW8WWvsu4kqFmNygyV2XbUEI2zwlHaJ0q s4xg3wAU5Bz/nOL2MY1GiNhHlJhqR4gaqmYrMpGKbh7/Geq75fIz7/zbpPWfXDeg m4PfOOXCHa2qp41xn1EW9BT7D0VTxpesaq5CMP2/PBwBNjlAcGzqsfD3mvda+JnA RsfowKo2Qm9JPOekejj37ALCGajE798tyut9Inl+gnSyRtsIjNBwlBzO9ovuwcjm pkD9AtHlx8w0e02KZDU/ezqKIFBkeju98botN0pMWeOI3+038lUBJQk8V5w7RKXn OtzQ7xZatwW2YM47kzxa+TuccGyfdG8Se67csDRxrRFshWcH6cXmzKYCkKBS6MGP XMRFo6Bh1OrCIZFseVzhZSEoA+0XABZGxeHGC7nyqD5sJkDtvPyhzcrJG9v/1Fgc M04Q7mOCkNL39UTfM1X2gjc8LiJrmozZgK7iDsseBh8ZQL8bWId3eIWRTi1r645x RmFZepGJp6zcoaC2oOpo =eN/D -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --zhXaljGHf11kAtnf--