From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 83076 invoked by alias); 8 Aug 2018 10:40:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 83060 invoked by uid 89); 8 Aug 2018 10:40:53 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=satisfied, planning, urgent X-HELO: dcvr.yhbt.net Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2018 10:40:00 -0000 From: Eric Wong To: Carlos O'Donell Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC/PoC] malloc: use wfcqueue to speed up remote frees Message-ID: <20180808104050.b4jlm2gc4bgukqqc@dcvr> References: <20180731084936.g4yw6wnvt677miti@dcvr> <0cfdccea-d173-486c-85f4-27e285a30a1a@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0cfdccea-d173-486c-85f4-27e285a30a1a@redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2018-08/txt/msg00151.txt.bz2 Carlos O'Donell wrote: > - Adding urcu as a build-time dependency is not acceptable for bootstrap, instead > we would bundle a copy of urcu and keep it in sync with upstream. Would that > make your work easier? Any ETA or update on urcu bundling? It's not urgent and I've been busy with other projects, too; but it could be helpful for planning around other work. Anyways, I'm pretty satisfied at my original patch and will use the __poll call in my next iteration. My main concern right now is not hurting existing fast cases. So I will need to look into more benchmarks on list archives and wiki... Thanks.