From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-alpha-return-95775-listarch-libc-alpha=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 39413 invoked by alias); 12 Sep 2018 09:06:22 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-alpha-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 39384 invoked by uid 89); 12 Sep 2018 09:06:22 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=
X-HELO: smtp2200-217.mail.aliyun.com
X-Alimail-AntiSpam:AC=CONTINUE;BC=0.06567236|-1;CH=green;FP=0|0|0|0|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=e02c03301;MF=han_mao@c-sky.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=4;RT=4;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---.Cppsyay_1536743175;
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 09:06:00 -0000
From: Mao Han <han_mao@c-sky.com>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Cc: c-sky_gcc_upstream@c-sky.com, gnu-csky@mentor.com,
	libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/13] C-SKY: ABI related code
Message-ID: <20180912090613.GA26405@vmh-VirtualBox>
References: <cover.1536720821.git.han_mao@c-sky.com>
 <cover.1536715883.git.han_mao@c-sky.com>
 <369062ae95df6648125b91354f707911cf8738de.1536720821.git.han_mao@c-sky.com>
 <CAMe9rOq1aukA=Df8Qx1kUpQ5DB7U0E6+HHWrpQNV3_UpgKvbtQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20180912070735.GA3771@vmh-VirtualBox>
 <0f0b5b18-056b-c622-e313-74bf714ecb2a@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <0f0b5b18-056b-c622-e313-74bf714ecb2a@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
X-SW-Source: 2018-09/txt/msg00144.txt.bz2

On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 10:23:29AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 09/12/2018 09:07 AM, Mao Han wrote:
> >It seems used to call some pre-init function for libc, register transactional
> >memory clone tables and invoke global constructors on C-SKY. Althrough I
> >haven't found any constructors call by _init, I just tend to have _init and
> >_fini as most other arch have these.
> 
> The expectation is that for new glibc ports, GCC is tweaked to generate the
> array variant of these constructs exclusively, like RISC-V did. Then you
> won't need the function variant.
> 
> Thanks,
> Florian

init_array seems work fine on C-SKY. I'll run the tests again to see whether
there is any new problems.

Han Mao