From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 86672 invoked by alias); 11 Nov 2019 14:33:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 86664 invoked by uid 89); 11 Nov 2019 14:33:52 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=H*RU:sk:smtpout, HX-Spam-Relays-External:sk:smtpout, specially, reviews X-HELO: smtpout1.mo528.mail-out.ovh.net Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 14:33:00 -0000 From: "Gabriel F. T. Gomes" To: Paul E Murphy CC: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/30] ldbl-128ibm-compat: Add wide character scanning functions Message-ID: <20191111113336.3b4393a4@tereshkova.br.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20191025153410.15405-1-gabriel@inconstante.net.br> <20191025153410.15405-9-gabriel@inconstante.net.br> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 8163618753054428728 X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK X-VR-SPAMSCORE: -100 X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedruddvjedgieejucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuqfggjfdqfffguegfifdpvefjgfevmfevgfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecuhedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhepfffhvffukfgjfhfogggtgfhisehtjeertdertddvnecuhfhrohhmpedfifgrsghrihgvlhcuhfdrucfvrdcuifhomhgvshdfuceoghgrsghrihgvlhesihhntghonhhsthgrnhhtvgdrnhgvthdrsghrqeenucfkpheptddrtddrtddrtddpfedvrddutdegrddukedrvddtvdenucfrrghrrghmpehmohguvgepshhmthhpqdhouhhtpdhhvghlohepgfgigedrvghmphdrlhhotggrlhdpihhnvghtpedtrddtrddtrddtpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepghgrsghrihgvlhesihhntghonhhsthgrnhhtvgdrvghtihdrsghrpdhrtghpthhtoheplhhisggtqdgrlhhphhgrsehsohhurhgtvgifrghrvgdrohhrghenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt X-SW-Source: 2019-11/txt/msg00356.txt.bz2 On Mon, 04 Nov 2019, Paul E Murphy wrote: > >With exception to some minor comments in my previous reviews, are there >any additional suggestions from the community? The *printf and *scanf >patches look ready to commit. Thanks, I'm running patches 1 to 8 with build-many-glibcs.py once again before I commit them, which I plan to do after the test is over. I think they got a lot of feedback, specially if you count the initial patches sent before Zack's refactoring of vfprinf_internal and vfscanf_internal, and have converged to this version based on community suggestions and guidance. :)