From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-alpha-return-108075-listarch-libc-alpha=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 114959 invoked by alias); 13 Dec 2019 21:13:42 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-alpha-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 114948 invoked by uid 89); 13 Dec 2019 21:13:42 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=H*F:D*br
X-HELO: smtpout1.mo803.mail-out.ovh.net
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2019 21:13:00 -0000
From: "Gabriel F. T. Gomes" <gabriel@inconstante.net.br>
To: Paul E Murphy <murphyp@linux.ibm.com>
CC: <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/11] ldbl-128ibm-compat: Add ISO C99 versions of
 scanf functions
Message-ID: <20191213181322.53f9cf17@tereshkova>
In-Reply-To: <924787d8-daa3-aca6-c042-908f5b1c4a22@linux.ibm.com>
References: <20191203170540.18428-1-gabriel@inconstante.net.br>
	<20191203170540.18428-3-gabriel@inconstante.net.br>
	<924787d8-daa3-aca6-c042-908f5b1c4a22@linux.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 18375249431270837816
X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK
X-VR-SPAMSCORE: -100
X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedrudelledgudegiecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfqggfjpdevjffgvefmvefgnecuuegrihhlohhuthemucehtddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkjghfofggtgfgihesthejredtredtvdenucfhrhhomhepfdfirggsrhhivghlucfhrdcuvfdrucfiohhmvghsfdcuoehgrggsrhhivghlsehinhgtohhnshhtrghnthgvrdhnvghtrdgsrheqnecukfhppedtrddtrddtrddtpddujeelrddukedvrdduhedurdekkeenucfrrghrrghmpehmohguvgepshhmthhpqdhouhhtpdhhvghlohepgfgigedrvghmphdrlhhotggrlhdpihhnvghtpedtrddtrddtrddtpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepghgrsghrihgvlhesihhntghonhhsthgrnhhtvgdrvghtihdrsghrpdhrtghpthhtoheplhhisggtqdgrlhhphhgrsehsohhurhgtvgifrghrvgdrohhrghenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt
X-SW-Source: 2019-12/txt/msg00507.txt.bz2

On Mon, 09 Dec 2019, Paul E Murphy wrote:

>On 12/3/19 11:05 AM, Gabriel F. T. Gomes wrote:
>> From: "Gabriel F. T. Gomes" <gabrielftg@linux.ibm.com>
>> 
>> +  /* For ISO C99, scan the single-precision value with "%as" to test
>> +     that __isoc99_*scanf ignores the 's'.  For DEPRECATED_SCANF, do not
>> +     use "%as", because that would try to scan a string and allocate
>> +     space for it.  */
>> +#if __GLIBC_USE (DEPRECATED_SCANF)
>> +# define FMT "%La %a"
>> +#else
>> +# define FMT "%La %as"
>> +#endif  
>
>That does simplify the patch nicely.  LGTM.

Thanks, this and the preceding patch are now committed.