From: Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>
To: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org, dj@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] Memory tagging support
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 10:12:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201124101258.GK20578@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201123154236.25809-1-rearnsha@arm.com>
The 11/23/2020 15:42, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> This is the third iteration of the patch set to enable memory tagging
> in glibc's malloc code. It mainly addresses the following issues raised
> during the previous review:
>
> - Clean up/add some internal API documentation
> - Remove ROUND_UP_ALLOCATION_SIZE and use some conditionalized code
> in checked_request2size instead.
> - Support MALLOC_CHECK_ in conjuction with _MTAG_ENABLE.
>
> The first two issues are addressed in patch 4 of this series, and the
> third in patch 5. I intend to merge patches 3, 4 and 5 into a single
> update to the malloc code before the final commit; I've kept them
> separate for now to (hopefully) simplify the review.
>
> The patches have all been rebased against master as of 2020/11/20.
>
> I spent quite a bit of time while working on these looking at whether
> the code could be refactored in order to reduce the places where
> SIZE_SZ was being added (in different multiples) to various pointers.
> I eventually concluded that this wasn't significantly improving the
> readability of the code, but one change has survived - I've replaced
> usage of 2 * SIZE_SZ with CHUNK_HDR_SZ when it is clear that this is
> referring to the header block at the start of a chunk.
>
> I've pushed a copy of this patch series to rearnsha/mte-v3.0, since I
> understand some people want to try the patch series as a whole.
cross testing with --enable-memory-tagging and
_MTAG_ENABLE=3 in qemu with arm64 for-next/mte
linux branch, the new failures i see:
FAIL: malloc/tst-malloc-backtrace
FAIL: malloc/tst-mallocstate
FAIL: malloc/tst-safe-linking
FAIL: malloc/tst-tcfree1
FAIL: malloc/tst-tcfree2
FAIL: malloc/tst-tcfree3
all these tests have use after free
FAIL: posix/tst-mmap
unaligned mmap over malloced memory now
fails with ENOMEM instead of EINVAL.
i think these are all reasonable failures for mte.
(the malloc/ ones can be unsupported, and the mmap
test can use mmaped memory instead of malloced)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-24 10:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-23 15:42 Richard Earnshaw
2020-11-23 15:42 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] config: Allow memory tagging to be enabled when configuring glibc Richard Earnshaw
2020-11-25 15:05 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2020-11-25 15:09 ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2020-11-25 15:10 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2020-11-25 15:12 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2020-11-25 16:11 ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2020-11-25 16:40 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2020-11-23 15:42 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] elf: Add a tunable to control use of tagged memory Richard Earnshaw
2020-11-25 15:08 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2020-11-25 16:35 ` H.J. Lu
2020-11-25 16:53 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2020-11-25 16:58 ` Richard Earnshaw
2020-11-25 17:12 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2020-11-25 17:24 ` Richard Earnshaw
2020-11-25 17:48 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2020-11-25 19:06 ` H.J. Lu
2020-11-26 0:47 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2020-11-26 14:15 ` Richard Earnshaw
2020-11-26 15:27 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2020-11-26 15:48 ` Richard Earnshaw
2020-11-26 15:50 ` H.J. Lu
2020-11-26 16:28 ` Richard Earnshaw
2020-11-26 16:51 ` H.J. Lu
2020-11-26 16:59 ` Richard Earnshaw
2020-11-26 17:06 ` H.J. Lu
2020-11-26 17:20 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2020-11-26 17:31 ` H.J. Lu
2020-11-26 17:56 ` Richard Earnshaw
2020-11-26 18:06 ` H.J. Lu
2020-11-26 18:06 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2020-11-26 18:09 ` H.J. Lu
2020-11-26 18:25 ` Andreas Schwab
2020-11-27 10:34 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2020-11-27 11:08 ` Florian Weimer
2020-11-27 2:59 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2020-11-27 10:32 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2020-11-27 11:14 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2020-11-26 16:04 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2020-11-26 16:19 ` H.J. Lu
2020-11-26 17:13 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2020-11-26 17:19 ` H.J. Lu
2020-11-27 2:45 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2020-11-27 10:40 ` Richard Earnshaw
2020-11-27 10:49 ` Richard Earnshaw
2020-11-27 11:32 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2020-11-27 11:51 ` Richard Earnshaw
2020-11-27 11:27 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2020-11-27 12:24 ` Richard Earnshaw
2020-11-27 14:54 ` H.J. Lu
2020-11-27 17:02 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2020-11-27 18:41 ` H.J. Lu
2020-11-27 14:52 ` H.J. Lu
2020-11-27 16:08 ` Richard Earnshaw
2020-11-27 18:37 ` H.J. Lu
2020-11-30 6:28 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2020-11-26 16:10 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2020-11-23 15:42 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] malloc: Basic support for memory tagging in the malloc() family Richard Earnshaw
2020-11-25 14:58 ` Florian Weimer
2020-11-25 17:32 ` Richard Earnshaw
2020-11-23 15:42 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] malloc: Clean up commentary Richard Earnshaw
2020-11-23 15:42 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] malloc: support MALLOC_CHECK_ in conjunction with _MTAG_ENABLE Richard Earnshaw
2020-11-23 15:42 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] linux: Add compatibility definitions to sys/prctl.h for MTE Richard Earnshaw
2020-11-25 15:26 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2020-11-23 15:42 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] aarch64: Add sysv specific enabling code for memory tagging Richard Earnshaw
2020-11-23 16:53 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2020-11-23 17:33 ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2020-11-25 15:34 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2020-11-25 16:06 ` Richard Earnshaw
2020-11-25 16:20 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2020-11-25 16:23 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2020-11-23 15:42 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] aarch64: Add aarch64-specific files for memory tagging support Richard Earnshaw
2020-12-16 15:26 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2020-11-24 10:12 ` Szabolcs Nagy [this message]
2020-11-25 14:49 ` [PATCH v3 0/8] Memory " Siddhesh Poyarekar
2020-11-25 15:48 ` Richard Earnshaw
2020-11-25 16:17 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2020-11-25 15:45 ` H.J. Lu
2020-12-17 3:57 ` DJ Delorie
2020-12-17 11:31 ` Richard Earnshaw
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201124101258.GK20578@arm.com \
--to=szabolcs.nagy@arm.com \
--cc=dj@redhat.com \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=rearnsha@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).