From: Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Cc: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>,
GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: Newer hwcap failures
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 10:43:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210129104310.GU3445@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87sg6kyu8j.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>
The 01/29/2021 10:20, Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha wrote:
> * Adhemerval Zanella:
>
> > The issue is test-container is copying the ld.so.cache from system into
> > testroot and thus _dl_sysdep_read_whole_file does not fail.
> >
> > For 32-bit builds, there is not ld.so.cache then _dl_sysdep_read_whole_file
> > fails and further ldconfig does not change the process map (since
> > _dl_load_cache_lookup won't reload the cache after an initial failure).
> >
> > That's explain why I am seeing this only on system with default 64-bit
> > userland. I don't know exactly why I haven't see this before, neither
> > if it were some testing regression added recently.
>
> I can't reproduce this (with an x86-64 host and a multilib toolchain).
> Does it require an i386 chroot to reproduce?
i see those tests fail with a config.make that has
cross-compiling = maybe
then /etc/ld.so.cache is missing from the install
directory (since ldconfig is not run)
i normally use a i686-linux-gnu toolchain on an
x86_64 machine to test i686, not a chroot/container.
in an i686 container with native gcc the tests pass.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-29 10:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-28 18:47 Adhemerval Zanella
2021-01-28 18:52 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-01-28 19:53 ` Florian Weimer
2021-01-28 20:01 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-01-28 20:21 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-01-28 20:30 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-01-28 21:23 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-01-28 22:03 ` DJ Delorie
2021-01-29 5:56 ` Florian Weimer
2021-01-29 6:07 ` DJ Delorie
2021-01-29 6:09 ` DJ Delorie
2021-01-29 9:20 ` Florian Weimer
2021-01-29 10:43 ` Szabolcs Nagy [this message]
2021-01-29 10:48 ` Florian Weimer
2021-01-29 10:51 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2021-01-29 11:53 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-01-29 12:46 ` H.J. Lu
2021-01-29 12:31 ` Florian Weimer
2021-01-29 13:06 ` Adhemerval Zanella
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210129104310.GU3445@arm.com \
--to=szabolcs.nagy@arm.com \
--cc=adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).