From: Fangrui Song <maskray@google.com>
To: Lukasz Majewski <lukma@denx.de>
Cc: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>,
Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>,
Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>,
libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dl: Use "adr" assembler command to get proper load address
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2021 09:49:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210907164906.yt6nonvfyhvbrx6p@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210907131616.23472-1-lukma@denx.de>
On 2021-09-07, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
>This change is a partial revert of commit
>bca0f5cbc9257c13322b99e55235c4f21ba0bd82 which imposed usage of
>__ehdr_start linker variable to get the address of loaded program.
>
>The elf_machine_load_address() function is declared in the
>sysdeps/arm/dl-machine.h header. It is called from _dl_start() entry
>point for the program. It shall return the load address of the dynamic
>linker program.
Yes.
>With this revert the 'adr' assembler instruction is used instead of a
>place holder:
>
>arm-poky-linux-gnueabi-objdump -t ld-linux-armhf.so.3 | grep ehdr
>00000000 l .note.gnu.build-id 00000000 __ehdr_start
>
>which shall be pre-set by binutils.
I don't understand this. The sh_addr field of the binutils defined
__ehdr_start is 0.
Declararing __ehdr_start as hidden and accessing it with PC-relative
addressing generates computes the runtime address of __ehdr_start, which
equals the load base.
What's wrong with it? The objdump -t line doesn't tell why this change
is good. Can you compare objdump -dr output and show the incorrect code
sequences with C assessing __ehdr_start?
>This is crucial in the QEMU ARM environment for which (when /sbin/init
>is executed) values set in __ehdr_start symbol are wrong. This causes
>the program to crash very early - when the /lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3 is
>executed as a prerequisite to /sbin/init execution.
>The kernel's fs/binfmt_elf.c is though responsible for setting
>up execution environment, not binutils.
Whether the symbol entry __ehdr_start exists doesn't matter.
The hidden definition does not have any associated relocation.
>It looks like the only robust way to obtain the _dl_start offset is to
>use assembler instruction - not rely on values provided by binutils.
>
>HW:
>Hardware name: ARM-Versatile Express (Run with QEMU)
>Tested (affected) kernels v5.1.12, v5.10.62 and v5.14.1
>
>When the /sbin/init is setup for run from Linux kernel's very small
>environment with LD_DEBUG=all the __ehdr_start is not shown at all.
>
>Fixes: BZ #28293
>---
> sysdeps/arm/dl-machine.h | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/sysdeps/arm/dl-machine.h b/sysdeps/arm/dl-machine.h
>index eb13cb8b57..58ebef6ecd 100644
>--- a/sysdeps/arm/dl-machine.h
>+++ b/sysdeps/arm/dl-machine.h
>@@ -38,11 +38,33 @@ elf_machine_matches_host (const Elf32_Ehdr *ehdr)
> }
>
> /* Return the run-time load address of the shared object. */
>-static inline ElfW(Addr) __attribute__ ((unused))
>+static inline Elf32_Addr __attribute__ ((unused))
> elf_machine_load_address (void)
> {
>- extern const ElfW(Ehdr) __ehdr_start attribute_hidden;
>- return (ElfW(Addr)) &__ehdr_start;
>+ Elf32_Addr pcrel_addr;
>+#ifdef SHARED
>+ extern Elf32_Addr __dl_start (void *) asm ("_dl_start");
>+ Elf32_Addr got_addr = (Elf32_Addr) &__dl_start;
>+ asm ("adr %0, _dl_start" : "=r" (pcrel_addr));
>+#else
>+ extern Elf32_Addr __dl_relocate_static_pie (void *)
>+ asm ("_dl_relocate_static_pie") attribute_hidden;
>+ Elf32_Addr got_addr = (Elf32_Addr) &__dl_relocate_static_pie;
>+ asm ("adr %0, _dl_relocate_static_pie" : "=r" (pcrel_addr));
>+#endif
>+#ifdef __thumb__
>+ /* Clear the low bit of the function address.
>+
>+ NOTE: got_addr is from GOT table whose lsb is always set by linker if it's
>+ Thumb function address. PCREL_ADDR comes from PC-relative calculation
>+ which will finish during assembling. GAS assembler before the fix for
>+ PR gas/21458 was not setting the lsb but does after that. Always do the
>+ strip for both, so the code works with various combinations of glibc and
>+ Binutils. */
>+ got_addr &= ~(Elf32_Addr) 1;
>+ pcrel_addr &= ~(Elf32_Addr) 1;
>+#endif
>+ return pcrel_addr - got_addr;
> }
>
> /* Return the link-time address of _DYNAMIC. */
>--
>2.20.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-07 16:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-07 13:16 Lukasz Majewski
2021-09-07 16:49 ` Fangrui Song [this message]
2021-09-07 17:32 ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-09-07 17:44 ` Fangrui Song
2021-09-08 15:05 ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-09-08 17:41 ` Fāng-ruì Sòng
2021-09-08 19:19 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-09-08 20:34 ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-09-09 7:18 ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-09-09 9:49 ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-09-10 10:10 ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-09-17 8:29 ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-09-17 13:27 ` Joseph Myers
2021-09-17 16:17 ` Andreas Schwab
2021-09-26 19:58 ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-09-27 16:00 ` Joseph Myers
2021-10-05 7:45 ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-10-06 7:57 ` Fangrui Song
2021-10-06 9:03 ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-10-06 11:43 ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-10-06 12:55 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2021-10-07 9:19 ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-10-07 10:00 ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-10-07 14:15 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2021-10-07 14:58 ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-10-07 14:16 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-10-07 14:29 ` H.J. Lu
2021-10-07 15:57 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2021-10-07 16:22 ` H.J. Lu
2021-10-07 16:53 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-10-07 17:05 ` H.J. Lu
2021-10-07 17:24 ` Fāng-ruì Sòng
2021-10-08 9:15 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2021-10-11 8:56 ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-10-11 10:18 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2021-10-11 11:47 ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-10-11 12:01 ` H.J. Lu
2021-10-11 13:10 ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-10-11 13:22 ` H.J. Lu
2021-10-11 14:31 ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-10-11 13:34 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-10-11 12:48 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2021-10-15 7:54 ` [PATCH v2] dl: Use "adr" assembler command to get proper load address on ARM Lukasz Majewski
2021-10-15 12:09 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2021-10-15 12:21 ` H.J. Lu
2021-10-15 12:59 ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-10-15 23:53 ` Fāng-ruì Sòng
2021-10-18 11:08 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2021-10-18 11:35 ` Florian Weimer
2021-10-19 12:03 ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-10-25 10:18 ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-10-25 10:25 ` Florian Weimer
2021-10-25 10:53 ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-10-25 13:34 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2021-10-25 14:04 ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-10-25 15:09 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2021-10-25 17:26 ` Joseph Myers
2021-10-26 13:52 ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-10-26 20:55 ` Joseph Myers
2021-10-27 9:38 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2021-10-25 18:25 ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-10-15 13:59 ` Lukasz Majewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210907164906.yt6nonvfyhvbrx6p@google.com \
--to=maskray@google.com \
--cc=adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org \
--cc=carlos@redhat.com \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=lukma@denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).