public inbox for libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
To: libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Cc: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>,
	Oleh Derevenko <oleh.derevenko@gmail.com>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
	Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>,
	"Paul A . Clarke" <pc@us.ibm.com>,
	Noah Goldstein <goldstein.w.n@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 2/3] Reduce CAS in __pthread_mutex_lock_full [BZ #28537]
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 10:41:52 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211110184153.2269857-3-hjl.tools@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211110184153.2269857-1-hjl.tools@gmail.com>

Change __pthread_mutex_lock_full to do an atomic load and skip CAS if
compare may fail to reduce cache line bouncing on contended locks.
---
 nptl/pthread_mutex_lock.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/nptl/pthread_mutex_lock.c b/nptl/pthread_mutex_lock.c
index 2bd41767e0..d7e8efedd2 100644
--- a/nptl/pthread_mutex_lock.c
+++ b/nptl/pthread_mutex_lock.c
@@ -223,13 +223,13 @@ __pthread_mutex_lock_full (pthread_mutex_t *mutex)
 	      newval |= (oldval & FUTEX_WAITERS) | assume_other_futex_waiters;
 #endif
 
-	      newval
-		= atomic_compare_and_exchange_val_acq (&mutex->__data.__lock,
-						       newval, oldval);
-
-	      if (newval != oldval)
+	      int val = atomic_load_relaxed (&mutex->__data.__lock);
+	      if (val != oldval
+		  || ((val = atomic_compare_and_exchange_val_acq
+			 (&mutex->__data.__lock, newval, oldval))
+		      != oldval))
 		{
-		  oldval = newval;
+		  oldval = val;
 		  continue;
 		}
 
@@ -411,11 +411,15 @@ __pthread_mutex_lock_full (pthread_mutex_t *mutex)
 # ifdef NO_INCR
 	newval |= FUTEX_WAITERS;
 # endif
+	oldval = atomic_load_relaxed (&mutex->__data.__lock);
+	if (oldval != 0)
+	  goto locked_mutex;
 	oldval = atomic_compare_and_exchange_val_acq (&mutex->__data.__lock,
 						      newval, 0);
 
 	if (oldval != 0)
 	  {
+ locked_mutex:;
 	    /* The mutex is locked.  The kernel will now take care of
 	       everything.  */
 	    int private = (robust
@@ -554,6 +558,10 @@ __pthread_mutex_lock_full (pthread_mutex_t *mutex)
 	    ceilval = ceiling << PTHREAD_MUTEX_PRIO_CEILING_SHIFT;
 	    oldprio = ceiling;
 
+	    oldval = atomic_load_relaxed (&mutex->__data.__lock);
+	    if (oldval != ceilval)
+	      goto ceilval_failed;
+
 	    oldval
 	      = atomic_compare_and_exchange_val_acq (&mutex->__data.__lock,
 #ifdef NO_INCR
@@ -568,10 +576,13 @@ __pthread_mutex_lock_full (pthread_mutex_t *mutex)
 
 	    do
 	      {
-		oldval
-		  = atomic_compare_and_exchange_val_acq (&mutex->__data.__lock,
-							 ceilval | 2,
-							 ceilval | 1);
+	        oldval = atomic_load_relaxed (&mutex->__data.__lock);
+ ceilval_failed:
+		if (oldval == (ceilval | 1))
+		  oldval
+		    = atomic_compare_and_exchange_val_acq (&mutex->__data.__lock,
+							   ceilval | 2,
+							   ceilval | 1);
 
 		if ((oldval & PTHREAD_MUTEX_PRIO_CEILING_MASK) != ceilval)
 		  break;
@@ -581,9 +592,10 @@ __pthread_mutex_lock_full (pthread_mutex_t *mutex)
 			      ceilval | 2,
 			      PTHREAD_MUTEX_PSHARED (mutex));
 	      }
-	    while (atomic_compare_and_exchange_val_acq (&mutex->__data.__lock,
-							ceilval | 2, ceilval)
-		   != ceilval);
+	    while (atomic_load_relaxed (&mutex->__data.__lock) != ceilval
+		   || (atomic_compare_and_exchange_val_acq (&mutex->__data.__lock,
+							    ceilval | 2, ceilval)
+		       != ceilval));
 	  }
 	while ((oldval & PTHREAD_MUTEX_PRIO_CEILING_MASK) != ceilval);
 
-- 
2.33.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-11-10 18:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-10 18:41 [PATCH v5 0/3] Optimize CAS " H.J. Lu
2021-11-10 18:41 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] Reduce CAS in low level locks " H.J. Lu
2021-11-10 18:41 ` H.J. Lu [this message]
2021-11-10 18:41 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] Optimize CAS in __pthread_mutex_lock_full " H.J. Lu
2021-11-10 20:23 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] Optimize CAS " Paul A. Clarke
2021-11-10 20:53   ` H.J. Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211110184153.2269857-3-hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    --to=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=goldstein.w.n@gmail.com \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=oleh.derevenko@gmail.com \
    --cc=pc@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=schwab@linux-m68k.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).