* [PATCH] linux: Use socket-constants-time64.h on tst-socket-timestamp-compat
@ 2022-02-14 13:37 Adhemerval Zanella
2022-02-14 14:28 ` Carlos O'Donell
2022-02-14 16:48 ` Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Adhemerval Zanella @ 2022-02-14 13:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: libc-alpha, Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho, Florian Weimer
The kernel header might not define the SO_TIMESTAMP{NS}_OLD or
SO_TIMESTAMP{NS}_NEW if it older than v5.1.
---
.../sysv/linux/tst-socket-timestamp-compat.c | 25 ++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/tst-socket-timestamp-compat.c b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/tst-socket-timestamp-compat.c
index 0ff1a214e6..2b1feb4766 100644
--- a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/tst-socket-timestamp-compat.c
+++ b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/tst-socket-timestamp-compat.c
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
#include <support/xsocket.h>
#include <support/xunistd.h>
#include <stdbool.h>
+#include <socket-constants-time64.h>
/* AF_INET socket and address used to receive data. */
static int srv;
@@ -88,7 +89,7 @@ do_test_large_buffer (bool mc)
/* Enable 32 bit timeval precision and check if no 64 bit timeval stamp
is created. */
{
- int r = setsockopt (srv, SOL_SOCKET, SO_TIMESTAMP_OLD, &(int){1},
+ int r = setsockopt (srv, SOL_SOCKET, COMPAT_SO_TIMESTAMP_OLD, &(int){1},
sizeof (int));
TEST_VERIFY_EXIT (r != -1);
@@ -103,10 +104,10 @@ do_test_large_buffer (bool mc)
if (cmsg->cmsg_level != SOL_SOCKET)
continue;
- if (sizeof (time_t) > 4 && cmsg->cmsg_type == SO_TIMESTAMP_NEW)
+ if (sizeof (time_t) > 4 && cmsg->cmsg_type == COMPAT_SO_TIMESTAMP_NEW)
found_timestamp = true;
else
- TEST_VERIFY (cmsg->cmsg_type != SO_TIMESTAMP_NEW);
+ TEST_VERIFY (cmsg->cmsg_type != COMPAT_SO_TIMESTAMP_NEW);
}
TEST_COMPARE (found_timestamp, sizeof (time_t) > 4);
@@ -114,7 +115,7 @@ do_test_large_buffer (bool mc)
/* Same as before, but for timespec. */
{
- int r = setsockopt (srv, SOL_SOCKET, SO_TIMESTAMPNS_OLD, &(int){1},
+ int r = setsockopt (srv, SOL_SOCKET, COMPAT_SO_TIMESTAMPNS_OLD, &(int){1},
sizeof (int));
TEST_VERIFY_EXIT (r != -1);
@@ -129,10 +130,10 @@ do_test_large_buffer (bool mc)
if (cmsg->cmsg_level != SOL_SOCKET)
continue;
- if (sizeof (time_t) > 4 && cmsg->cmsg_type == SO_TIMESTAMPNS_NEW)
+ if (sizeof (time_t) > 4 && cmsg->cmsg_type == COMPAT_SO_TIMESTAMPNS_NEW)
found_timestamp = true;
else
- TEST_VERIFY (cmsg->cmsg_type != SO_TIMESTAMPNS_NEW);
+ TEST_VERIFY (cmsg->cmsg_type != COMPAT_SO_TIMESTAMPNS_NEW);
}
TEST_COMPARE (found_timestamp, sizeof (time_t) > 4);
@@ -151,7 +152,7 @@ do_test_small_buffer (bool mc)
/* Enable 32 bit timeval precision and check if no 64 bit timeval stamp
is created. */
{
- int r = setsockopt (srv, SOL_SOCKET, SO_TIMESTAMP_OLD, &(int){1},
+ int r = setsockopt (srv, SOL_SOCKET, COMPAT_SO_TIMESTAMP_OLD, &(int){1},
sizeof (int));
TEST_VERIFY_EXIT (r != -1);
@@ -172,10 +173,10 @@ do_test_small_buffer (bool mc)
if (cmsg->cmsg_level != SOL_SOCKET)
continue;
- if (sizeof (time_t) > 4 && cmsg->cmsg_type == SO_TIMESTAMP_NEW)
+ if (sizeof (time_t) > 4 && cmsg->cmsg_type == COMPAT_SO_TIMESTAMP_NEW)
found_timestamp = true;
else
- TEST_VERIFY (cmsg->cmsg_type != SO_TIMESTAMP_NEW);
+ TEST_VERIFY (cmsg->cmsg_type != COMPAT_SO_TIMESTAMP_NEW);
}
if (sizeof (time_t) > 4)
@@ -192,7 +193,7 @@ do_test_small_buffer (bool mc)
/* Same as before, but for timespec. */
{
- int r = setsockopt (srv, SOL_SOCKET, SO_TIMESTAMPNS_OLD, &(int){1},
+ int r = setsockopt (srv, SOL_SOCKET, COMPAT_SO_TIMESTAMPNS_OLD, &(int){1},
sizeof (int));
TEST_VERIFY_EXIT (r != -1);
@@ -213,10 +214,10 @@ do_test_small_buffer (bool mc)
if (cmsg->cmsg_level != SOL_SOCKET)
continue;
- if (sizeof (time_t) > 4 && cmsg->cmsg_type == SO_TIMESTAMPNS_NEW)
+ if (sizeof (time_t) > 4 && cmsg->cmsg_type == COMPAT_SO_TIMESTAMPNS_NEW)
found_timestamp = true;
else
- TEST_VERIFY (cmsg->cmsg_type != SO_TIMESTAMPNS_NEW);
+ TEST_VERIFY (cmsg->cmsg_type != COMPAT_SO_TIMESTAMPNS_NEW);
}
if (sizeof (time_t) > 4)
--
2.32.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] linux: Use socket-constants-time64.h on tst-socket-timestamp-compat
2022-02-14 13:37 [PATCH] linux: Use socket-constants-time64.h on tst-socket-timestamp-compat Adhemerval Zanella
@ 2022-02-14 14:28 ` Carlos O'Donell
2022-02-14 16:48 ` Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Carlos O'Donell @ 2022-02-14 14:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Adhemerval Zanella, libc-alpha, Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho,
Florian Weimer
On 2/14/22 08:37, Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha wrote:
> The kernel header might not define the SO_TIMESTAMP{NS}_OLD or
> SO_TIMESTAMP{NS}_NEW if it older than v5.1.
LGTM. Will fix an issue compiling glibc 2.35 on RHEL8.
Reviewed-by: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>
> ---
> .../sysv/linux/tst-socket-timestamp-compat.c | 25 ++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/tst-socket-timestamp-compat.c b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/tst-socket-timestamp-compat.c
> index 0ff1a214e6..2b1feb4766 100644
> --- a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/tst-socket-timestamp-compat.c
> +++ b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/tst-socket-timestamp-compat.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
> #include <support/xsocket.h>
> #include <support/xunistd.h>
> #include <stdbool.h>
> +#include <socket-constants-time64.h>
>
> /* AF_INET socket and address used to receive data. */
> static int srv;
> @@ -88,7 +89,7 @@ do_test_large_buffer (bool mc)
> /* Enable 32 bit timeval precision and check if no 64 bit timeval stamp
> is created. */
> {
> - int r = setsockopt (srv, SOL_SOCKET, SO_TIMESTAMP_OLD, &(int){1},
> + int r = setsockopt (srv, SOL_SOCKET, COMPAT_SO_TIMESTAMP_OLD, &(int){1},
OK. Use the COMPAT_* versions throughout.
> sizeof (int));
> TEST_VERIFY_EXIT (r != -1);
>
> @@ -103,10 +104,10 @@ do_test_large_buffer (bool mc)
> if (cmsg->cmsg_level != SOL_SOCKET)
> continue;
>
> - if (sizeof (time_t) > 4 && cmsg->cmsg_type == SO_TIMESTAMP_NEW)
> + if (sizeof (time_t) > 4 && cmsg->cmsg_type == COMPAT_SO_TIMESTAMP_NEW)
> found_timestamp = true;
> else
> - TEST_VERIFY (cmsg->cmsg_type != SO_TIMESTAMP_NEW);
> + TEST_VERIFY (cmsg->cmsg_type != COMPAT_SO_TIMESTAMP_NEW);
> }
>
> TEST_COMPARE (found_timestamp, sizeof (time_t) > 4);
> @@ -114,7 +115,7 @@ do_test_large_buffer (bool mc)
>
> /* Same as before, but for timespec. */
> {
> - int r = setsockopt (srv, SOL_SOCKET, SO_TIMESTAMPNS_OLD, &(int){1},
> + int r = setsockopt (srv, SOL_SOCKET, COMPAT_SO_TIMESTAMPNS_OLD, &(int){1},
> sizeof (int));
> TEST_VERIFY_EXIT (r != -1);
>
> @@ -129,10 +130,10 @@ do_test_large_buffer (bool mc)
> if (cmsg->cmsg_level != SOL_SOCKET)
> continue;
>
> - if (sizeof (time_t) > 4 && cmsg->cmsg_type == SO_TIMESTAMPNS_NEW)
> + if (sizeof (time_t) > 4 && cmsg->cmsg_type == COMPAT_SO_TIMESTAMPNS_NEW)
> found_timestamp = true;
> else
> - TEST_VERIFY (cmsg->cmsg_type != SO_TIMESTAMPNS_NEW);
> + TEST_VERIFY (cmsg->cmsg_type != COMPAT_SO_TIMESTAMPNS_NEW);
> }
>
> TEST_COMPARE (found_timestamp, sizeof (time_t) > 4);
> @@ -151,7 +152,7 @@ do_test_small_buffer (bool mc)
> /* Enable 32 bit timeval precision and check if no 64 bit timeval stamp
> is created. */
> {
> - int r = setsockopt (srv, SOL_SOCKET, SO_TIMESTAMP_OLD, &(int){1},
> + int r = setsockopt (srv, SOL_SOCKET, COMPAT_SO_TIMESTAMP_OLD, &(int){1},
> sizeof (int));
> TEST_VERIFY_EXIT (r != -1);
>
> @@ -172,10 +173,10 @@ do_test_small_buffer (bool mc)
> if (cmsg->cmsg_level != SOL_SOCKET)
> continue;
>
> - if (sizeof (time_t) > 4 && cmsg->cmsg_type == SO_TIMESTAMP_NEW)
> + if (sizeof (time_t) > 4 && cmsg->cmsg_type == COMPAT_SO_TIMESTAMP_NEW)
> found_timestamp = true;
> else
> - TEST_VERIFY (cmsg->cmsg_type != SO_TIMESTAMP_NEW);
> + TEST_VERIFY (cmsg->cmsg_type != COMPAT_SO_TIMESTAMP_NEW);
> }
>
> if (sizeof (time_t) > 4)
> @@ -192,7 +193,7 @@ do_test_small_buffer (bool mc)
>
> /* Same as before, but for timespec. */
> {
> - int r = setsockopt (srv, SOL_SOCKET, SO_TIMESTAMPNS_OLD, &(int){1},
> + int r = setsockopt (srv, SOL_SOCKET, COMPAT_SO_TIMESTAMPNS_OLD, &(int){1},
> sizeof (int));
> TEST_VERIFY_EXIT (r != -1);
>
> @@ -213,10 +214,10 @@ do_test_small_buffer (bool mc)
> if (cmsg->cmsg_level != SOL_SOCKET)
> continue;
>
> - if (sizeof (time_t) > 4 && cmsg->cmsg_type == SO_TIMESTAMPNS_NEW)
> + if (sizeof (time_t) > 4 && cmsg->cmsg_type == COMPAT_SO_TIMESTAMPNS_NEW)
> found_timestamp = true;
> else
> - TEST_VERIFY (cmsg->cmsg_type != SO_TIMESTAMPNS_NEW);
> + TEST_VERIFY (cmsg->cmsg_type != COMPAT_SO_TIMESTAMPNS_NEW);
> }
>
> if (sizeof (time_t) > 4)
--
Cheers,
Carlos.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] linux: Use socket-constants-time64.h on tst-socket-timestamp-compat
2022-02-14 13:37 [PATCH] linux: Use socket-constants-time64.h on tst-socket-timestamp-compat Adhemerval Zanella
2022-02-14 14:28 ` Carlos O'Donell
@ 2022-02-14 16:48 ` Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho @ 2022-02-14 16:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Adhemerval Zanella, libc-alpha, Florian Weimer
Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org> writes:
> The kernel header might not define the SO_TIMESTAMP{NS}_OLD or
> SO_TIMESTAMP{NS}_NEW if it older than v5.1.
This patch solved the issue I was seeing.
Reviewed-by: Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho <tuliom@linux.ibm.com>
Thanks!
--
Tulio Magno
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-02-14 16:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-02-14 13:37 [PATCH] linux: Use socket-constants-time64.h on tst-socket-timestamp-compat Adhemerval Zanella
2022-02-14 14:28 ` Carlos O'Donell
2022-02-14 16:48 ` Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).