From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=10DM=UW=ens-lyon.org=samuel.thibault@bounce.ens-lyon.org>
Received: from sonata.ens-lyon.org (domu-toccata.ens-lyon.fr [140.77.166.138])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB0E8385840C
 for <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 20:18:44 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org DB0E8385840C
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org;
 dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ens-lyon.org
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org;
 spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bounce.ens-lyon.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by sonata.ens-lyon.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B9262010A;
 Tue, 12 Apr 2022 22:18:44 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from sonata.ens-lyon.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (sonata.ens-lyon.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 4p0PDBIaP16X; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 22:18:43 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from begin (lfbn-bor-1-255-114.w90-50.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.50.98.114])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest
 SHA256) (No client certificate requested)
 by sonata.ens-lyon.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EC98720100;
 Tue, 12 Apr 2022 22:18:43 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from samy by begin with local (Exim 4.95)
 (envelope-from <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>) id 1neMyJ-00BPOh-JS;
 Tue, 12 Apr 2022 22:18:43 +0200
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 22:18:43 +0200
From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH,hurd] Fix arbitrary error code
Message-ID: <20220412201843.zgd5z7g5sfhblgp5@begin>
References: <20220412094434.nqpydlozpprrkg6r@begin>
 <87h76yhblu.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>
 <20220412095742.ebmvavh2rhr63kcj@begin>
 <87czhmh9ud.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87czhmh9ud.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>
Organization: I am not organized
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3)
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL,
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP,
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/options/libc-alpha>,
 <mailto:libc-alpha-request@sourceware.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-alpha-request@sourceware.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/libc-alpha>,
 <mailto:libc-alpha-request@sourceware.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 20:18:45 -0000

Florian Weimer, le mar. 12 avril 2022 12:31:06 +0200, a ecrit:
> * Samuel Thibault:
> 
> >> I don't see a build failure because of this?
> >
> > The build failure happens during make check, not during make.
> 
> Huh.  For me, it does not.

Maybe I was not precise enough: the build failure happens on GNU/Hurd
systems only, where make check can actually not only build but also run
programs.

> >> Maybe we can pick another shared error code?
> >
> > Yep, sure, I'm just not sure what should be used.
> 
> We can use an arbitrary constant such as -1009.

Ok, done so!

Samuel