From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DA343858D20 for ; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 21:47:43 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 2DA343858D20 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gnu.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gnu.org Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pn4n7-0007q1-D3; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 17:47:41 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Subject:To:From: Date; bh=CTzgKHMynP/RpphOydcwYncXlo4CH6rZTF77TdRYUpk=; b=o+VVBSUtR2FiaHWFRjNX bL+smy9J6zOWuryv5NsAZcK1w3xLEdtF8mb6Fzfa7q4mVSyYHWCdSaWfO/1lcO+Tt4Wif0lr7qUt6 FQQx/U3l7nuWPyHBZ9wXJhy2LRoF6PQV7N53c/mQlM+AcOgTJTZUFE6FaDaAloyXsCN2p9DKAJSRj 6dMU31iuidMvcXU7iWF3kcfDGwkSnshVVyJEE4KC8xiCe0pV7TglUvY7mWjEbSFdu8v9kuDZl67AZ zI4kHQAw27y7sTNI5MB6OynPW1gihjZiuJ5eK8qB3y1XTExnkO1i2vhRBsST+TMQn3pjBqKrlrUyO 54IgSpeGPcjTlQ==; Received: from [2a01:cb19:4a:a400:de41:a9ff:fe47:ec49] (helo=begin) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pn4n6-000715-Db; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 17:47:40 -0400 Received: from samy by begin with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1pn4n4-003iA1-1b; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 23:47:38 +0200 Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 23:47:38 +0200 From: Samuel Thibault To: Sergey Bugaev Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org, bug-hurd@gnu.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH glibc 24/34] hurd: Only check for TLS initialization inside rtld or in static builds Message-ID: <20230413214738.gz2rjnvjvwci7v4o@begin> Mail-Followup-To: Sergey Bugaev , libc-alpha@sourceware.org, bug-hurd@gnu.org References: <20230412234657.ntztyz7iau55lcwt@begin> <20230413101058.wfmy7mb4dexsrbio@begin> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Organization: I am not organized User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Hello, Sergey Bugaev, le jeu. 13 avril 2023 15:17:51 +0300, a ecrit: > I have now sent the second version of > that patch, please try applying it and test if that fixes it. I'll give it a try. > Please also check if the other reply port tweak you reverted today is > also innocent. The same tests fail, but differently :) € ./testrun.sh signal/tst-signal --direct Set handler. Sending myself signal 15. Received signal 15 (Terminated). Fatal glibc error: ../sysdeps/mach/hurd/mig-reply.c:92 (__mig_dealloc_reply_port): assertion failed: port == arg Abandon (core dumped) #0 0x01027a5c in __GI___mach_msg_trap () at /usr/src/glibc-upstream/build/mach/mach_msg_trap.S:2 2 kernel_trap (__mach_msg_trap,-25,7) [Current thread is 1 (process 20128)] (gdb) bt #0 0x01027a5c in __GI___mach_msg_trap () at /usr/src/glibc-upstream/build/mach/mach_msg_trap.S:2 #1 0x010281f6 in __GI___mach_msg (msg=0x10017d0, option=3, send_size=48, rcv_size=32, rcv_name=31, timeout=0, notify=0) at msg.c:111 #2 0x012eb1e8 in __msg_sig_post (process=27, signal=6, sigcode=0, refport=35) at /usr/src/glibc-upstream/build/hurd/RPC_msg_sig_post.c:158 #3 0x01074dbc in kill_port (refport=, msgport=) at ../sysdeps/mach/hurd/kill.c:67 #4 kill_pid (pid=pid@entry=20128) at ../sysdeps/mach/hurd/kill.c:104 #5 0x0107509c in __GI___kill (pid=, sig=) at ../sysdeps/mach/hurd/kill.c:138 #6 0x01074242 in __GI_raise (signo=6) at ../sysdeps/htl/raise.c:52 #7 __GI_raise (signo=6) at ../sysdeps/htl/raise.c:34 #8 0x010277b1 in __GI_abort () at abort.c:79 #9 0x0102791c in __libc_message (fmt=) at ../sysdeps/posix/libc_fatal.c:150 #10 0x0106bc20 in __libc_assert_fail (assertion=0x1222762 "port == arg", file=0x121c2a0 "../sysdeps/mach/hurd/mig-reply.c", line=92, function=0x121c2c4 <__PRETTY_FUNCTION__.0> "__mig_dealloc_reply_port") at __libc_assert_fail.c:31 #11 0x010283d2 in __GI___mig_dealloc_reply_port (arg=) at ../sysdeps/mach/hurd/mig-reply.c:92 #12 0x012eb23e in __msg_sig_post (process=27, signal=15, sigcode=0, refport=35) at /usr/src/glibc-upstream/build/hurd/RPC_msg_sig_post.c:160 #13 0x01074dbc in kill_port (refport=, msgport=) at ../sysdeps/mach/hurd/kill.c:67 #14 kill_pid (pid=pid@entry=20128) at ../sysdeps/mach/hurd/kill.c:104 #15 0x0107509c in __GI___kill (pid=, sig=) at ../sysdeps/mach/hurd/kill.c:138 #16 0x01074242 in __GI_raise (signo=15) at ../sysdeps/htl/raise.c:52 #17 __GI_raise (signo=15) at ../sysdeps/htl/raise.c:34 #18 0x010075ac in ?? () #19 0x0105d88f in __libc_start_call_main (argv=0x0, argc=16807472, main=0x2) at ../sysdeps/generic/libc_start_call_main.h:23 #20 __libc_start_main_impl (main=0x2, argc=16807472, argv=0x0, init=0x1007657, fini=0x1007540, rtld_fini=0x2, stack_end=0x1001d54) at ../csu/libc-start.c:360 I have put these on https://dept-info.labri.fr/~thibault/tmp/libc.so https://dept-info.labri.fr/~thibault/tmp/ld.so https://dept-info.labri.fr/~thibault/tmp/core Samuel