From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B716A385AF83 for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2023 17:26:54 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org B716A385AF83 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1690478813; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=yINt68+ZBAkVspro/JnXnLh6n2u2f7guKy9a18OabV0=; b=Pj99eushof0GvUT1eFFMXxAiVUVb96yDRopK6gQ/sIdQO2i7fhYY4st1P5k7t7oUc4yo1c rmkcaEI7+7eEeX1Blbcc90WKekMW8MKGicmvnV+EmX1oYTY2HrsTF4VeQ8/sgg69lxRcZE IIrKcR6F3PVAOYqEgaOpDVBkynPNpN8= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-650-yMlQUc14M92YX-AmOYebFQ-1; Thu, 27 Jul 2023 13:26:50 -0400 X-MC-Unique: yMlQUc14M92YX-AmOYebFQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 444A5873232; Thu, 27 Jul 2023 17:26:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oak (unknown [10.22.10.15]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E840492B02; Thu, 27 Jul 2023 17:26:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2023 13:26:48 -0400 From: Joe Simmons-Talbott To: "Andreas K. Huettel" Cc: Carlos O'Donell , libc-alpha@sourceware.org, Xi Ruoyao Subject: Re: [PATCH] tst-personality: Check for ENOSYS Message-ID: <20230727172648.GI6392@oak> References: <20230725175714.1727827-1-josimmon@redhat.com> <8ff6322d-a18e-38f2-5d3d-2772cd35540f@redhat.com> <225e4509406caf972befe14fca56485c6e43b1d0.camel@xry111.site> <2333860.1xdlsreqCQ@kona> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2333860.1xdlsreqCQ@kona> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.9 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 04:20:40PM +0200, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 27. Juli 2023, 04:20:37 CEST schrieb Xi Ruoyao via Libc-alpha: > > > > Some "container environment" I guess. Note that personality is added in > > Linux 1.1.20 so there is no way a Linux system does not have this > > syscall today. > > > > To me we really should not try to support all these container > > environments with too-clever seccomp filters. > > > > > It would be good to comment in the commit message the system or > > > systems under which this occurs. > > > > Documenting precisely which tests fail precisely where would be very useful > indeed. I started a stub wiki page about it a few days ago, feel free > to extend it: > > https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Testing/Containers I've added some notes about my findings in Fedora podman containers. > > Also, it's rather trivial to mark specific tests as XFAIL in a build > environment, see e.g. > https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/tree/sys-libs/glibc/glibc-2.37-r3.ebuild#n158 > https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/tree/sys-libs/glibc/glibc-2.37-r3.ebuild#n1223 Thanks, this was helpful. Thanks, Joe