From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gnu.wildebeest.org (gnu.wildebeest.org [45.83.234.184]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56FA93858022 for ; Fri, 1 Sep 2023 09:21:34 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 56FA93858022 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=klomp.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=klomp.org Received: by gnu.wildebeest.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5248E305EC91; Fri, 1 Sep 2023 11:21:33 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2023 11:21:33 +0200 From: Mark Wielaard To: Sam James Cc: Florian Weimer , Jakub Jelinek , Andreas Schwab , Joseph Myers , Maxim Kuvyrkov , libc-alpha@sourceware.org Subject: dmarc, dkim and From rewriting Message-ID: <20230901092133.GB22481@gnu.wildebeest.org> References: <15af1715-3530-7c29-7595-5abe48c18e8b@cs.ucla.edu> <87ledqe8ej.fsf@gentoo.org> <87fs3yp91h.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> <877cpae033.fsf@gentoo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <877cpae033.fsf@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3028.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Hi, On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 10:02:23AM +0100, Sam James via Libc-alpha wrote: > Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha writes: > > * Sam James via Libc-alpha: > > > >> As far as I've seen, the sourceware overseers handle requests > >> promptly. Is there something we've asked them to do which they've > >> been unable to fulfill? > > > > Removing the From: header rewriting from the mailing lists, including > > libc-alpha. With the current list configuration, “git am” often does > > not produce correct results. > > Have we communicated that to the overseers though (that it's so serious > it's worth moving services over)? > Obviously there's https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29713 > already from you, but that's not the same as "this is a showstopper". > > I wasn't aware this was a serious blocker given b2 helps collect the > Reviewed-bys anyway. But I can understand it being a pain for some > people's workflows. Sorry this is being resolved slowly. But as you can see in the bug progress is being made, we just upgraded our mailman instance again last week. I had requested testers a couple of months ago [1], but didn't get much/any response, so I thought this wasn't very urgent. I think we are ready to switch the list to not use From rewriting for lists that want that. We could test it next week? Cheers, Mark [1] https://inbox.sourceware.org/libc-alpha/Y2GocuarFslwvb9j@wildebeest.org/