From: Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net>
To: libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: document the fact that "Known Maximum Errors" might not be maximal
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 13:39:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240216123950.GC3653@qaa.vinc17.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <p9u0y1bk1xys.fsf@coriandre.loria.fr>
On 2024-02-16 11:54:03 +0100, Paul Zimmermann wrote:
> Vincent,
>
> > If I understand correctly, Carlos means (unintended) bugs, in which
> > case, values may even be completely wrong (as already seen). I think
> > that saying "documented elsewhere" is misleading. And note that bugs
> > are not specific to the math functions. Any buggy library function
> > will not behave as described in the manual. You should rather say
> > that the given bounds obviously do not take bugs into account, if
> > you think that this is worth recalling.
>
> of course *unknown* bugs might exist, but we are speaking of *known*
> defects here.
Well, known bugs in non-math functions are never documented either.
For instance, concerning regexps, there is bug 10844[*], which has
been known since 2009 (more than 14 years ago) and is not documented.
[*] https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10844
> The issue is that the manual says "*Known* Maximum Errors in Math Functions".
>
> What do you suggest to avoid users deducing from the manual that the ulp error on say y0
> is bounded by 3 ulps on x86_64, whereas it can be as large as 5.93e15 ulps?
>
> Checking y0 with glibc-2.39/build and rndn
> GNU libc version: 2.39
> GNU libc release: stable
> y0 0 -1 0x1.c982eb8d417eap-1 [5920543797734652] [5.93e+15] 5.92055e+15 5920543797734652
> libm gives -0x1.8p-55
> mpfr gives -0x1.af74bfa0f1304p-56
If I understand correctly, the *intent* is to give an error bounded
by 3 ulp, i.e. an error up to 3 ulp is not something that the user
should expect to be "fixed".
Perhaps the glibc manual should provide a way to find known bugs
more easily. That said, typing "y0" in bugzilla immediately gives
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16492
(for some other functions, which are also common words, this is not
that obvious).
--
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-16 12:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-16 8:48 Paul Zimmermann
2024-02-16 9:43 ` Vincent Lefevre
2024-02-16 10:02 ` Paul Zimmermann
2024-02-16 10:22 ` Vincent Lefevre
2024-02-16 10:54 ` Paul Zimmermann
2024-02-16 12:39 ` Vincent Lefevre [this message]
2024-02-16 17:32 ` Joseph Myers
2024-02-16 17:22 ` Joseph Myers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240216123950.GC3653@qaa.vinc17.org \
--to=vincent@vinc17.net \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).