From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gnu.wildebeest.org (gnu.wildebeest.org [45.83.234.184]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D38873858D1E for ; Sun, 25 Feb 2024 22:47:43 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org D38873858D1E Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=klomp.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=klomp.org ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org D38873858D1E Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=45.83.234.184 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1708901266; cv=none; b=TFML994FdgSaj9FEYiZZ8heUjPk7/qB6C7iIE1Yz6hmWLgg9htr3AQhiKvh6by1tahyJeBkSqbV+u9QwwZJCSLiDrLtm5xuUTYmKA6szygJ0kQe0efSuqyYFt6X7VwKbbaIS+aBTwD8gxIEEhOxq2AllMpNRVJvAttU9TAikoh4= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1708901266; c=relaxed/simple; bh=YN1WWJvOzvO4m9viaLGl7DaiQ9puaEWLKKCrTOfWqxs=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=VkEVSPafrnYXev+QtDnXLesU+EAxFu6sIyGfyORkw0JxH3CIRYUu9uXmGX3Q384Osd1yR/FqRm/v1WmsDtpUncsnsjMm5k3+9A6xYKnUypBioZGsNtg+4UUq2fJK/Kqcm1o0PX05ucARGJVoIHDG/S4DCpGV2ILBjyacVMBEb1g= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Received: by gnu.wildebeest.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 826F33000400; Sun, 25 Feb 2024 23:47:42 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2024 23:47:42 +0100 From: Mark Wielaard To: "Andreas K. Huettel" Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org Subject: Re: state of the ports Message-ID: <20240225224742.GB15517@gnu.wildebeest.org> References: <4155299.iIbC2pHGDl@noumea> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4155299.iIbC2pHGDl@noumea> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Hi, On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 03:35:04AM +0100, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > So... after all the testing gone into the release I thought I'd > summarize a bit for the list here - by sorting the glibc ports into > "excellent", "good", "medium", "bad", and "nobody even tried". We have several buildbots at builder.sourceware.org for glibc which probably should start sending build failure emails when things break. https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#/builders?tags=glibc > 1. EXCELLENT > ============ > > aarch64 > - tests pass nearly everywhere > - on raspi, likely timeouts https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#/builders/glibc-debian-arm64 Used to have some tests time out, but since we are running with TIMEOUTFACTOR=4 is all green: 4807 PASS 22 UNSUPPORTED 16 XFAIL 2 XPASS > powerpc64 > powerpc64le > - tests pass https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#/builders/glibc-debian-ppc64 https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#/builders/glibc-fedora-ppc64le We only do a make subdirs=elf check but those all pass: glibc-debian-ppc64: 341 PASS 5 UNSUPPORTED 2 XPASS glibc-fedora-ppc64le: 338 PASS 2 UNSUPPORTED 2 XPASS > s390x > - tests pass https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#/builders/glibc-fedora-s390x Likewise, just subdirs=elf: 336 PASS 2 UNSUPPORTED 2 XPASS For ppc64, ppc64le and s390x we could run a different subset if that is more useful. The issue really is the nptl subdir, which just takes a very long time (because it doesn't run any test in parallel?) > x86-64 > - tests pass Fully green on glibc-fedora-x86_64 https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#/builders/glibc-fedora-x86_64 4945 PASS 274 UNSUPPORTED 16 XFAIL 4 XPASS But on glibc-debian-testing-x86_64 and glibc-rawhide-x86_64 it occassionally sees one FAIL: elf/tst-audit10 which times out even with TIMEOUTFACTOR=4 > riscv64 > - ~5 failures, but there may be timeouts among them https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#/builders/glibc-ubuntu-riscv With TIMEOUTFACTOR=4 there are no (timeout) failures anymore. 4699 PASS 24 UNSUPPORTED 16 XFAIL 2 XPASS This is the slowest of them all (takes 2 hours 15 minutes to 3 hours, depending on how good the ccache is). But we have multiple riscv boards now thanks to StarFive and one of them is dedicated to glibc. > sparc > - ~5 failures (!) Seeing even more failures: 9 FAIL 4725 PASS 23 UNSUPPORTED 17 XFAIL 2 XPASS FAIL: elf/tst-audit18 FAIL: elf/tst-pldd FAIL: elf/tst-ptrguard1 FAIL: math/test-float64x-float128-mul FAIL: nptl/tst-mutex9 FAIL: nptl/tst-oddstacklimit FAIL: posix/tst-spawn7-pidfd FAIL: socket/tst-socket-timestamp FAIL: stdlib/tst-setcontext2 > x86 (32bit) > - in general tests pass > - there may be breakage on old hw (pentium2) Really a i386 VM on x86_64: https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#/builders/glibc-debian-i386 4851 PASS 40 UNSUPPORTED 16 XFAIL 6 XPASS Cheers, Mark