public inbox for libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>,
	"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: SIGBUS failure for misc/tst-bz21269 on i386
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 08:01:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <23e0f059-1fd0-8b95-ce35-99eba8a96a30@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180327214707.GA4207@aurel32.net>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1298 bytes --]

On 03/27/2018 11:47 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Here is the coredump that I can get:
> 
>    Thread 1 "tst-bz21269" received signal SIGBUS, Bus error.
>    0x565564a0 in do_test () at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/tst-bz21269.c:217
>    217           while (atomic_load (&ftx) != 0)
>    (gdb) bt
>    #0  0x565564a0 in do_test () at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/tst-bz21269.c:217
>    #1  0x56556bc2 in support_test_main (argc=<optimized out>, argv=0xffffd518, config=0xffffd424) at support_test_main.c:321
>    #2  0x56556061 in main (argc=2, argv=0xffffd514) at ../support/test-driver.c:164
>    (gdb) print &ftx
>    $1 = (atomic_uint *) 0x5655a0e0 <ftx>
>    (gdb) print ftx
>    $2 = 0

Ahh.  I see.

       /* Fire up thread modify_ldt call.  */
       atomic_store (&ftx, 2);

       while (atomic_load (&ftx) != 0)
	;

       /* On success, modify_ldt will segfault us synchronously and we 
will escape via siglongjmp.  */
       support_record_failure ();

But:

   xsethandler (SIGSEGV, sigsegv_handler, 0);
   /* 32-bit kernels send SIGILL instead of SIGSEGV on IRET faults.  */
   xsethandler (SIGILL, sigsegv_handler, 0);

So some kernels apparently use SIGBUS instead, and the crash actually 
shows the test succeeded.

Would you please try the attached patch?

Thanks,
Florian

[-- Attachment #2: sigbus.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 902 bytes --]

Subject: [PATCH] Linux i386: tst-bz21269 triggers SIGBUS on some kernels
To: libc-alpha@sourceware.org

In addition to SIGSEGV and SIGILL, SIGBUS is also a possible signal
generated by the kernel.

2018-03-28  Florian Weimer  <fweimer@redhat.com>

	* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/tst-bz21269.c (do_test): Also
	capture SIGBUS.

diff --git a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/tst-bz21269.c b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/tst-bz21269.c
index 353e36507d..6ee3fc62be 100644
--- a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/tst-bz21269.c
+++ b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/tst-bz21269.c
@@ -177,6 +177,8 @@ do_test (void)
   xsethandler (SIGSEGV, sigsegv_handler, 0);
   /* 32-bit kernels send SIGILL instead of SIGSEGV on IRET faults.  */
   xsethandler (SIGILL, sigsegv_handler, 0);
+  /* Some kernels send SIGBUS instead.  */
+  xsethandler (SIGBUS, sigsegv_handler, 0);
 
   thread = xpthread_create (0, threadproc, 0);
 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-03-28  8:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-14 13:35 Florian Weimer
2018-03-14 13:44 ` H.J. Lu
2018-03-14 16:47   ` Adhemerval Zanella
2018-03-27 21:47 ` Aurelien Jarno
2018-03-27 21:58   ` H.J. Lu
2018-03-28  6:47     ` Aurelien Jarno
2018-03-28  8:01   ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2018-03-28 17:37     ` Aurelien Jarno
2018-03-28 17:47       ` Florian Weimer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=23e0f059-1fd0-8b95-ce35-99eba8a96a30@redhat.com \
    --to=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=aurelien@aurel32.net \
    --cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).