From: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>
To: Wilco Dijkstra <Wilco.Dijkstra@arm.com>,
'GNU C Library' <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add random benchmark
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2023 09:38:35 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <28681765-c150-65a2-5f46-51172070263b@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <PAWPR08MB8982D7F540068200C32DA70983BCA@PAWPR08MB8982.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
On 11/28/23 12:35, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
>
> Add a simple benchmark to measure the overhead of internal libc locks in
> the random() implementation on both single- and multi-threaded cases.
>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/benchtests/Makefile b/benchtests/Makefile
> index e1346bbda125be9fc2b216f9e8be3f2ee7cb0c4d..1415d20e25798871936f3e2b87f8690517239b21 100644
> --- a/benchtests/Makefile
> +++ b/benchtests/Makefile
> @@ -247,6 +247,7 @@ hash-benchset := \
> stdlib-benchset := \
> arc4random \
> strtod \
> + random-lock \
Fails pre-commit CI.
https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/glibc/patch/PAWPR08MB8982D7F540068200C32DA70983BCA@PAWPR08MB8982.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com/
This inserts a routine in a non-sorted order in the alpha-sorted list.
lint-makefiles should fail for you?
> # stdlib-benchset
>
> stdio-common-benchset := sprintf
> diff --git a/benchtests/bench-random-lock.c b/benchtests/bench-random-lock.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ff11f807359c05043366c855751a97a383b1b132
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/benchtests/bench-random-lock.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
> +/* Benchmark internal libc locking functions used in random.
> + Copyright (C) 2022-2023 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> + This file is part of the GNU C Library.
> +
> + The GNU C Library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> + modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
> + License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
> + version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
> +
> + The GNU C Library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> + but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
> + Lesser General Public License for more details.
> +
> + You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public
> + License along with the GNU C Library; if not, see
> + <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. */
> +
> +#define TEST_MAIN
> +#define TEST_NAME "random-lock"
> +
> +#include <pthread.h>
> +#include <stdio.h>
> +#include <stdlib.h>
> +#include "bench-timing.h"
> +#include "json-lib.h"
> +
> +/* Modern cores run 20M iterations in about 1 second. */
> +#define NUM_ITERS 40000000
> +
> +json_ctx_t json_ctx;
> +
> +
> +/* Measure the overhead of __libc_lock_lock and __libc_lock_unlock by
> + calling random (). */
> +static void
> +bench_random_lock (size_t iters)
> +{
> + timing_t start, stop, total;
> +
> + srandom (0);
> +
> + /* Warmup to reduce variations due to frequency scaling. */
> + for (int i = 0; i < iters / 4; i++)
> + (void) random ();
> +
> + TIMING_NOW (start);
> +
> + for (int i = 0; i < iters; i++)
> + (void) random ();
> +
> + TIMING_NOW (stop);
> +
> + TIMING_DIFF (total, start, stop);
> +
> + json_element_double (&json_ctx, (double) total / (double) iters);
> +}
> +
> +static void *
> +thread_start (void *p)
> +{
> + return p;
> +}
> +
> +int
> +do_bench (void)
> +{
> + json_init (&json_ctx, 0, stdout);
> +
> + json_document_begin (&json_ctx);
> +
> + json_attr_string (&json_ctx, "timing_type", TIMING_TYPE);
> + json_attr_object_begin (&json_ctx, "functions");
> + json_attr_object_begin (&json_ctx, "random");
> + json_attr_string (&json_ctx, "bench-variant", "single-threaded");
> + json_array_begin (&json_ctx, "results");
> +
> + /* Run benchmark single threaded. */
> + bench_random_lock (NUM_ITERS);
> +
> + json_array_end (&json_ctx);
> + json_attr_object_end (&json_ctx);
> +
> + json_attr_object_begin (&json_ctx, "random");
> + json_attr_string (&json_ctx, "bench-variant", "multi-threaded");
> + json_array_begin (&json_ctx, "results");
> +
> + /* Start a short thread to force SINGLE_THREAD_P == false. This relies on
> + the runtime disabling single-threaded optimizations when multiple
> + threads are used, even after they finish. */
> +
> + pthread_t t;
> + pthread_create (&t, NULL, thread_start, NULL);
> + pthread_join (t, NULL);
> +
> + /* Repeat benchmark with single-threaded optimizations disabled. */
> + bench_random_lock (NUM_ITERS);
> +
> + json_array_end (&json_ctx);
> + json_attr_object_end (&json_ctx);
> + json_attr_object_end (&json_ctx);
> + json_document_end (&json_ctx);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +#define TEST_FUNCTION do_bench ()
> +
> +#include "../test-skeleton.c"
>
>
>
--
Cheers,
Carlos.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-04 14:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-28 17:35 Wilco Dijkstra
2023-12-04 14:38 ` Carlos O'Donell [this message]
2024-03-18 15:17 Wilco Dijkstra
2024-04-16 16:55 ` Adhemerval Zanella Netto
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=28681765-c150-65a2-5f46-51172070263b@redhat.com \
--to=carlos@redhat.com \
--cc=Wilco.Dijkstra@arm.com \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).