From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from forward500a.mail.yandex.net (forward500a.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:c0e:500:1:45:d181:d500]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D0DC3858414 for ; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 20:57:19 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 3D0DC3858414 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=yandex.ru Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=yandex.ru Received: from mail-nwsmtp-smtp-production-main-31.vla.yp-c.yandex.net (mail-nwsmtp-smtp-production-main-31.vla.yp-c.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:c18:58f:0:640:3768:0]) by forward500a.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 767BD5E89A; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 23:57:16 +0300 (MSK) Received: by mail-nwsmtp-smtp-production-main-31.vla.yp-c.yandex.net (smtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id Everhh7DR4Y0-LR5vGzoc; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 23:57:15 +0300 X-Yandex-Fwd: 1 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1681419436; bh=4dBVc7pEmZbirLRErlRkUA9KSxL8tZBY+i4eGuJEwcw=; h=From:In-Reply-To:Cc:Date:References:To:Subject:Message-ID; b=l4x9Nhm5P7/AtL3ewORhoQHAUwSvVQW+wZ+IpWLtK6/ZZMmdke3CLhSd12xOHtYMy Pt1lbxanVKiOdBihZ8D9yCJLTI9TsXBQ7xHoRrWBSh3+XLltkhZez7VCurO5lizq9j sxdSEan8cHIusEj2WBYzWiI1TwvSmCP51gZkhnRI= Authentication-Results: mail-nwsmtp-smtp-production-main-31.vla.yp-c.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.ru Message-ID: <28fc8c01-527f-2a36-2f39-b76dbdcea1b7@yandex.ru> Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 01:57:13 +0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.10.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/13] implement dlmem() function Content-Language: en-US To: Adhemerval Zanella Netto , Szabolcs Nagy , Rich Felker Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org, janderson@rice.edu, Carlos O'Donell References: <298b04a6-3055-b89b-59c1-4cfbe955848e@yandex.ru> <81749d04-8cdb-de0b-b88e-24347ed535ba@yandex.ru> <729710b5-6dae-d5f2-99ee-6923be5e627d@yandex.ru> <20230412182043.GI3298@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <08d9ca95-112c-d85e-8e82-7a595ef4d051@yandex.ru> <78b5b5dc-5657-4bf8-24c6-6c00afb1cc40@yandex.ru> <83ee7b42-7a50-e8d1-e9ca-58ec2a12a995@linaro.org> <59862084-0fe3-7642-d3b3-01bb87eef7db@yandex.ru> <52d0b5e8-2c81-66e6-60dc-771d01b26fd6@linaro.org> From: stsp In-Reply-To: <52d0b5e8-2c81-66e6-60dc-771d01b26fd6@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,BODY_8BITS,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: 14.04.2023 01:02, Adhemerval Zanella Netto пишет: > Because every time someone bring the corner cases you just dismiss saying Compare that with corner cases brought by Szabolcs. Have I ignored a single one? > that either the person does not understand you [1] So was a hope. I didn't know it was intentional. > and it is up to review > prove you are wrong; Why do you intentionally omit the posting where I actually provide a proof, after getting off of an initial shock? https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2023-March/146742.html > or you dismiss saying that the remarks are not > applicable. Yes. The quoted remarks are not applicable. I proved that, see above URL. And I explicitly asked a few times, do you need more proofs, and if so - what kind of? Its still relevant - I can code up any proof you want, if the above obvious proof wasn't sufficient. That conspiracy theory could only work if not for Szabolcs who have started the actual review, and not for the spec drafts that I published, etc. After all these I was hoping you will no longer bring that to public, but you did. :(