Am Montag, 29. Januar 2024, 23:10:41 CET schrieb Jakub Jelinek:
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 09:30:19PM +0000, Joseph Myers wrote:
> > On Mon, 29 Jan 2024, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > 
> > > Most of the other tests (except the tests for side-effects in arguments)
> > > have constant arguments and so can be folded very early during compilation,
> > > even the side-effects in arguments tests can be folded soon when optimizing,
> > > so these functions were just an attempt to make sure the macros can be
> > > compiled/linked when the arguments are certainly not known.
> > > But if you think it isn't worth checking that or if it is already tested by
> > > some other test, I can remove that.
> > 
> > I think the existing tests adequately cover non-constant arguments 
> > (non-constant unless you unroll the test loop and extract the arguments 
> > from a const array of structures then propagate from the variable storing 
> > them after loading from the array, that is).  What the existing tests 
> > don't actually cover for standard types (and this new test does cover) is 
> > constant arguments.
> 
> Ok, removed that part of the test.
> 
> > Note that as we're currently in release freeze for glibc 2.39, a new 
> > feature change such as this should probably only go in before 2.39 is 
> > released with the approval of Andreas K. Hüttel as release manager (while 
> > if going in after 2.39 is released, the new feature of unsigned __int128 / 
> > unsigned _BitInt support should get a NEWS entry for 2.40).
> 
> Andreas, your thoughts on whether this can be added to 2.39 or needs to wait
> for 2.40?  It is an extension to a new feature (stdbit.h has been added on
> 3rd of January) and doesn't have ABI consequences.

Hi Jakub, let's please do this after the release (i.e. for 2.40). 

I plan to branch tomorrow or wednesday, which means there is barely any time
for wider testing anymore.

Thanks! A


-- 
Andreas K. Hüttel
dilfridge@gentoo.org
Gentoo Linux developer
(council, toolchain, base-system, perl, libreoffice)