From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-alpha-return-73793-listarch-libc-alpha=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 122093 invoked by alias); 6 Oct 2016 21:28:27 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-alpha-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 121691 invoked by uid 89); 6 Oct 2016 21:28:27 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_RED autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:832
X-HELO: mail-vk0-f47.google.com
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
         :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=3Cm5n2JqT2hWHrnVrKsP5CsFu1IRrL32oHi8YC5A43Y=;
        b=HXRH6mBi8yyvUHbXFI2Y6J3aT78gFo6y3i8ejCePC90TGOByMzrqI+K707v7QxlJny
         qAJdtl1ja1HVkDJaVMcGewa0GFt2kbTQCY6sokJJ6BqHX4j5Gecn+LIFajHHrLwmK7MY
         6nMAzNgZoi26ioLdWU+Z68pMhjIcwmUSGGDCOWOUiXesyNL2Fi5eRXr+vS4qDOQY8Fb2
         bM2tPiK1N+SUBA+YjQjsSXEfDAkaMYlWnjxHEHeW7nOVfdQ04+6kxwyI/Z4dpmdHqtF7
         1BAgr7DFNTRzo73AyByC8DiM+kMcVe6T+R/IBm69H0jkJCiOcy6tlEHGSAoqeYU9ZJM3
         MbqQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RkNwNwlQkzfvfFZyNfgYl292CA+ih3Y6LbifvUwIlytep9bOrJEf6ResXLxJo6qi3bc
X-Received: by 10.31.83.133 with SMTP id h127mr12867523vkb.166.1475789295041;
        Thu, 06 Oct 2016 14:28:15 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Add an x86 IFUNC testcase for [BZ #20019]
To: libc-alpha@sourceware.org
References: <20161004184621.GB27454@intel.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.20.1610042122170.17011@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
 <CAMe9rOrvz5nZZUVMq5qc_FT2g9iKzpGQ6-ydESmmm3CP5BVmJg@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.20.1610042253170.17011@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
 <CAMe9rOpzKV4oLgCrX+scC=MVH-TM_TRAcOZrLUg06L0YvEZuRw@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.20.1610050009080.17011@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
 <CAMe9rOrtbOXOKYa2fiazJZb0WfZ0KbRr0thwvYOTdL=D3qHt-g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <333da70c-15de-db94-a257-b65fe58cfc01@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2016 21:28:00 -0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAMe9rOrtbOXOKYa2fiazJZb0WfZ0KbRr0thwvYOTdL=D3qHt-g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2016-10/txt/msg00153.txt.bz2



On 05/10/2016 15:16, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 5:09 PM, Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, 5 Oct 2016, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>
>>> I can try __builtin_memcpy, instread of __builtin_memmove.   There are 2
> 
> I changed it to use __builtin_memset.
> 
>>> acceptable results.  One is ld.so issues an error and the other is program runs.
>>> On x86, ld.so issues an error.  I don't know what should happen on others.
>>
>> You could make the test pass on either of those results (while failing if
>> ld.so crashes).
>>
> 
> I moved the test to elf.  It passes if the test runs or ld.so issues an
> error.  Please try it on arm, powerpc and s390.
> 

It shows no issue neither on arm (gcc 4.8.4, binutils 2.24) or powerpc64le
(gcc 5.4.0, binutils 2.26.1).