From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F24813857C52 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 18:37:23 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org F24813857C52 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org F24813857C52 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1704911845; cv=none; b=GbkDuoADqjxBL5bbnnr5iTPhKgoF2VbvaTPamIJnJR3WP9P8q2DPe/gVSvIJI5JKLJ42xnu4Cu5kpMoJud88OJ24X0ibJlc/JMTq0UtF42N5OVbKoQU0RCso2/PatJ78mOT/ZyAyy6TQFbF9QtrWu+bu3SGX1JwRYKUx52qLa9w= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1704911845; c=relaxed/simple; bh=OBLjcY5obtqt8JhyOm5Ha00xXocPhabeZevK+vsHfx8=; h=DKIM-Signature:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From; b=Ky+tnMEJ4wUgXSPP/GJf7XNuiXgUqmR30vnD/lZEaHRgpiK1Syz5NQp9O7PT7u8BqG7CiWD+NlwYYckX3a+QVkuIjwahzGsXPj427CC9we25RQE3pyvgrJEC4ljnxls8x4zvvzf7zeM9Nl/eIwi8kRgP6pmWE3j57O+pqaNTmTw= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1704911843; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=4GT/2aVuql0tITLAClnOVnvlEz1FJgmf6jOfY/xv1io=; b=D5R7clE1BzFDUyfKOfHXtRt2QHFIpaqLE/1VvjZeS5N+y7qLzwWwuW4ATHkUFriuLmzKYT Wd2EQ++d258yxOCXafA320czPHKN1wM47F03/4IOJy8hKgXBbxrZX7cX8zseieEN6vJESz acVoGDDjJNo6sDjrUIaTpzx9gTBugB0= Received: from mail-qk1-f197.google.com (mail-qk1-f197.google.com [209.85.222.197]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-561-RbmOBl2qNz-wfubFtg-5OA-1; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 13:37:21 -0500 X-MC-Unique: RbmOBl2qNz-wfubFtg-5OA-1 Received: by mail-qk1-f197.google.com with SMTP id af79cd13be357-7833751431dso94452485a.1 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 10:37:21 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1704911841; x=1705516641; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:organization:from:references :to:content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=4GT/2aVuql0tITLAClnOVnvlEz1FJgmf6jOfY/xv1io=; b=mgJ3Um46r6GIXOc1AahCoKXuAbMrGwVeYk4qdFxmRDegLXps05glk5TyXALLmwndgk 8N3xfWkWKTNOb4688iFSo1heNeFivL09LCEix9UHRcPuSK40eVJ7JVJxGy9e9FmbOO60 N18G1XFkSXUohXyBjon3X5Q2Udby/+sqIqDEo0TfmyhDJEwvA0N4IVip9W2l807GyQH0 /D+Pq0udw0Ufcb8T9JA6nzNwyDM1X1fKta5cGHnMwt0VaT7FGGZ888oGO4LpbiYohcJP mbpl0ZG4B2z49en9rso5s2+MgNkWlWIQTcQB2u3rharF8bSQMH+MID15mtdVUbUEvJ4g pL5g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxDJPyrqrWXKiFsNYbK3sCuk3OGe6CKd6f3sBVMHp9LISxnaTtY OVnG/JP7jbHr6X4WvnSHCS5WeuGf7FfxoEwSs3hnbVlGmwMe5N5vZsWe+ywJsY5jr4XhE5SWbWc Bi/0MYqSbeSdpzrjQBA9EWrvk5GAL X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:9c1:b0:783:31d6:226e with SMTP id y1-20020a05620a09c100b0078331d6226emr46495qky.156.1704911841260; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 10:37:21 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHFpCX54R2ifUgUJ6UUma7ZPLDxTPcsnixq59kcj8/ethFhGGgqBj8b7bPWZOgSVXd9Z5NCtg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:9c1:b0:783:31d6:226e with SMTP id y1-20020a05620a09c100b0078331d6226emr46485qky.156.1704911841039; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 10:37:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.241] ([198.48.244.52]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z1-20020ae9c101000000b0078162695b73sm1785414qki.104.2024.01.10.10.37.19 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 10 Jan 2024 10:37:20 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <34c4dc4f-add9-2162-47df-1e995e6c9aae@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 13:37:18 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH, test conversion, RFC] Convert to autoconf 2.72 (no patches) To: =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_K=2e_H=c3=bcttel?= , libc-alpha@sourceware.org References: <2945535.X9hSmTKtgW@noumea> <20240102191743.520137-1-dilfridge@gentoo.org> From: Carlos O'Donell Organization: Red Hat In-Reply-To: <20240102191743.520137-1-dilfridge@gentoo.org> X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On 1/2/24 14:17, Andreas K. Hüttel wrote: > From: "Andreas K. Huettel" I support moving to autoconf 2.72 for glibc 2.40. I do *not* support moving to autoconf 2.72 for glibc 2.39 (upcoming release). I think we should not make such changes in the freeze window. The only impact that I'm aware of is that clang can't build a patched glibc. Since you're patching glibc to build it with clang you can further patch it to reconfigure with autoconf 2.72. When we officially support clang for building glibc then we need to fix this issue. -- Cheers, Carlos.