public inbox for libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Test for profiling support (_mcount/gprof)
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 15:32:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <357353c9-2633-a1a5-4d78-49862087a8a5@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <mvmy3qjr0m2.fsf@suse.de>

On 08/16/2017 05:30 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> On Aug 16 2017, Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 08/16/2017 05:20 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>>> On Aug 16 2017, Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> If you don't use --enable-frame-pointer for GCC, there's no apparent
>>>> reason to me to build glibc with --fomit-frame-pointer because it's the
>>>> default (albeit in a fashion that is compatible with -pg).
>>>
>>> That is not true.
>>
>> It is currently true—I don't see why anyone would want to build glibc
>> this way.  Could you enlighten me?
> 
> To omit the frame pointer.

But GCC does it by default if you don't build with
--enable-frame-pointer, at least on i386, which is the architecture for
which you reported the failure.

Thanks,
Florian

  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-16 15:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-15 12:05 Florian Weimer
2017-08-15 12:29 ` Andreas Schwab
2017-08-15 12:46   ` Florian Weimer
2017-08-15 12:56     ` Andreas Schwab
2017-08-15 13:04       ` Florian Weimer
2017-08-15 13:34         ` Andreas Schwab
2017-08-15 14:18           ` Florian Weimer
2017-08-15 16:32             ` Joseph Myers
2017-08-15 16:40               ` Florian Weimer
2017-08-15 16:53                 ` Joseph Myers
2017-08-16  6:46         ` Andreas Schwab
2017-08-16  7:07           ` Florian Weimer
2017-08-16  7:52             ` Andreas Schwab
2017-08-16  8:09               ` Florian Weimer
2017-08-16  8:42                 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2017-08-16 15:05                 ` Andreas Schwab
2017-08-16 15:07                   ` Florian Weimer
2017-08-16 15:20                     ` Andreas Schwab
2017-08-16 15:28                       ` Florian Weimer
2017-08-16 15:31                         ` Andreas Schwab
2017-08-16 15:32                           ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2017-08-16 20:03                             ` H.J. Lu
2017-08-16 21:04                               ` Florian Weimer
2017-08-16 21:11                                 ` H.J. Lu
2017-08-16 21:19                                   ` H.J. Lu
2017-08-17  7:44                                     ` Florian Weimer
2017-08-17 11:57                                       ` H.J. Lu
2017-08-17  6:36                             ` Andreas Schwab
2017-10-05 10:52                 ` Florian Weimer
2017-10-05 12:19                   ` Andreas Schwab
2017-10-05 12:21                     ` Florian Weimer
2017-10-05 12:31                       ` Andreas Schwab
2017-10-05 12:38                         ` Florian Weimer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=357353c9-2633-a1a5-4d78-49862087a8a5@redhat.com \
    --to=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=schwab@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).