public inbox for libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>
To: libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Subject: Monday Patch Queue Review update (2023-03-06)
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2023 09:58:31 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <35eaeca3-25e7-ff03-13f2-468c84d83678@redhat.com> (raw)

Most recent meeting status is always here:
https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/PatchworkReviewMeetings#Update

Meeting: 2023-03-06 @ 0900h EST5EDT

Video/Audio: https://bbb.linuxfoundation.org/room/adm-alk-1uu-7fu

IRC: #glibc on OFTC.

Review new patches and restart review at the top.

 - State NEW delegate NOBODY is at 214 patches.
 - Carlos' SLI at 161 days.
 - Discussed "[v3,2/4] libio: Remove the usage of __libc_IO_vtables"
  - Decision is to rely on existing regression test suite.
  - Concerned with static link issues that don't bring in everything.
  - v4 needed to fix the typo in "_IO_file_jumps_alia"
  - What about "pragma weak" for _IO_default_* functions?
  - libio_static_fn_required (defined at libio/libioP.h)
  - Carlos: What pulls in libio/genops.c? Pulled in by _IO_un_link?
   - Florian's suggestion is to remove pragma weak for _IO_default.
 - Why does LD_PRELOAD not work with RTLD_DEEPBIND?
  - Already had a WONTFIX bug for that.
  - https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25533
  - https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30186
 - Carlos raised the issue of Message-ID's with slashes in them.
  - Siddhesh: Yes we do have the fix in patchwork, but it looks incomplete.
  - https://github.com/getpatchwork/patchwork/issues/518
 - [v3] elf: Fix slow tls access after dlopen [BZ #19924] (Szabolcs)
  - Needs review for P&C issues.

-- 
Cheers,
Carlos.


                 reply	other threads:[~2023-03-06 14:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=35eaeca3-25e7-ff03-13f2-468c84d83678@redhat.com \
    --to=carlos@redhat.com \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).