From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xry111@xry111.site>
Received: from xry111.site (xry111.site [IPv6:2001:470:683e::1])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C2D33858C2D
 for <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 01:30:53 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 1C2D33858C2D
Received: from [IPv6:240e:358:115c:cb00:dc73:854d:832e:2] (unknown
 [IPv6:240e:358:115c:cb00:dc73:854d:832e:2])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature ECDSA (P-384))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 (Authenticated sender: xry111@xry111.site)
 by xry111.site (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8CA3B6686C;
 Mon, 15 Aug 2022 21:30:45 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <3740676145dbfab3595458d7a730272acd6fb928.camel@xry111.site>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] LoongArch: Add pointer mangling support.
From: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
To: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>, caiyinyu <caiyinyu@loongson.cn>
Cc: xuchenghua@loongson.cn, i.swmail@xen0n.name, libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 09:30:40 +0800
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2208152050040.311521@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
References: <20220811040056.3164122-1-caiyinyu@loongson.cn>
 <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2208152050040.311521@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
User-Agent: Evolution 3.45.2 
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
 DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD,
 LIKELY_SPAM_FROM, PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP,
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/options/libc-alpha>,
 <mailto:libc-alpha-request@sourceware.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-alpha-request@sourceware.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/libc-alpha>,
 <mailto:libc-alpha-request@sourceware.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 01:30:54 -0000

On Mon, 2022-08-15 at 20:52 +0000, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Aug 2022, caiyinyu wrote:
>=20
> > Tested on LoongArch machine: gcc 13.0.0, Linux kernel 5.19.0 rc2,
> > binutils branch master 2eb132bdfb9.
>=20
> This appears to have broken the build-many-glibcs.py build ("Fatal error:=
=20
> unknown reloc hint: pc_hi20").=C2=A0 Is that something that would be fixe=
d by=20
> using binutils 2.39 branch instead of 2.38 branch in build-many-glibcs.py=
?

No, we must use Binutils-2.40 for new relocation types like %pc_hi20.=20
Maybe we can add a configure check to fallback to "la.pcrel"/"la.got"
macros for Binutils <=3D 2.39.

--=20
Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University