public inbox for libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>
To: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>, libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Future of libio vtable compatibility
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 16:07:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3a215566-1748-a095-8bfa-c5c1d5017156@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87h8m41oa0.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>

On 06/15/2018 03:50 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Should we instead remove the compatibility logic altogether?

The libio vtable internal ABI compatibility has been a real source 
of pain over the years, and it has prevented the general cleanup 
of the libio code.

We learned that first hand in the malloc code during the removal of
the dump code for Emacs which also had a similar internal ABI
dependency.

However, in the case of the dumper, only emacs was known to be
affected. In the case of the vtable compat it is potentially any
number of old applications.

I'm inclined to argue that glibc 2.x should remain compatible with
the old internal ABI of the vtables, but that perhaps a future glibc
with a new major version might drop it entirely.

Should we start seriously talking about glibc 3.x?

Cheers,
Carlos.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-06-18 16:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-15  7:50 Florian Weimer
2018-06-18 16:07 ` Carlos O'Donell [this message]
2018-06-18 17:15   ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-18 17:41     ` Zack Weinberg
2018-06-18 18:25       ` Adhemerval Zanella
2018-06-18 19:08       ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-18 19:26         ` Zack Weinberg
2018-06-18 19:22     ` Carlos O'Donell
2018-06-18 20:18       ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-18 20:28         ` Carlos O'Donell
     [not found]           ` <878t7bu834.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
     [not found]             ` <80e0f086-a966-618d-7b27-1f42a7b9a5c9@redhat.com>
2018-06-19 19:11               ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-19 19:20                 ` Carlos O'Donell
2018-06-19 12:18       ` Joseph Myers
2018-06-19 12:39         ` Adhemerval Zanella

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3a215566-1748-a095-8bfa-c5c1d5017156@redhat.com \
    --to=carlos@redhat.com \
    --cc=fw@deneb.enyo.de \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).