From: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@sourceware.org>
To: Wilco Dijkstra <Wilco.Dijkstra@arm.com>,
'GNU C Library' <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] realloc: Return unchanged if request is within usable size
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2022 09:13:01 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3cc4e7f1-fa60-edf7-c31b-a3ba34ae4eab@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <PAWPR08MB8982FB5595F28F88787A1B1D83139@PAWPR08MB8982.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
On 2022-11-28 04:22, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
> Hi Siddhesh,
>
> I think the idea of having a fast path in realloc is good since it is a more standard
> interface than malloc_usable_size, so improving performance for obvious cases
> where we can return the original pointer makes sense. It will help badly written
> code that does a realloc when growing an array 1 element at a time.
>
> However the proposed patch will block realloc from ever releasing memory...
Thanks for pointing that out, I missed it.
> We do need to handle the case where the size is smaller than the usable size since
> we'd still want to free the unused portion if it is a significant fraction of the total size.
I'll make this a function of trim_threshold so that the reuse happens
only if the difference between the request and usable size is less than
the trim_threshold.
> Note the mmap code always tries to remap before checking the new size is smaller
> than usable size - so will end up remapping even if you downsize by one page.
I don't see that; I've put the musable check before the
chunk_is_mmapped() check. What am I missing?
Thanks,
Sid
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-28 14:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-28 9:22 Wilco Dijkstra
2022-11-28 14:13 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar [this message]
2022-12-06 12:45 ` Wilco Dijkstra
2022-12-06 18:41 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2023-07-03 22:02 ` Aurelien Jarno
2023-07-04 11:17 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2023-07-04 16:08 ` Aurelien Jarno
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-11-25 20:09 Siddhesh Poyarekar
2022-11-25 20:40 ` Andreas Schwab
2022-11-28 14:23 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2022-11-28 14:29 ` Andreas Schwab
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3cc4e7f1-fa60-edf7-c31b-a3ba34ae4eab@sourceware.org \
--to=siddhesh@sourceware.org \
--cc=Wilco.Dijkstra@arm.com \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).