From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43E7B3945C3D for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 05:12:02 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 43E7B3945C3D Received: from mail-il1-f198.google.com (mail-il1-f198.google.com [209.85.166.198]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-539-cszbb8tsNaCHzjxZZ4OJBQ-1; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 00:11:53 -0500 X-MC-Unique: cszbb8tsNaCHzjxZZ4OJBQ-1 Received: by mail-il1-f198.google.com with SMTP id j10-20020a056e02154a00b002b7e05c596aso1355671ilu.22 for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 21:11:53 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent :content-language:to:from:subject:organization :content-transfer-encoding; bh=MNAnzXCdrNg2cBdhmkcSnASD/0v3ExGS6J39fIFZazo=; b=ii/OAX8V7st93bVOso0E+NiNrZExVNRg71VyK1WL2+Uz6k6p1+S6BviYNV4WSsPXB1 4JNczJNKwYZr5Mf5ooBGygQ3iZsjepY2Vw9Yh6nN1aXdJXnPekY6j2kBmP9pYL4WPJ1y 2lcE4jjJEcCVVK0pndNcD6i3jkzD8uAbDi/eoeWar66iR1e0BvQQgaVnd/XsosuuN3O/ W0Cn77dz9IcktkQnr8lAm4yeDQwiUxQhfYp5diqUetrcos7kJsa/wISOdkOzGBJGPGA5 RFxfOVmwp5Sh+DelbPwRuV50xYAAXF4rvZLi7L1ZWpBjEFeTnM2QzD6yt15idE6jcK5h N96Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531S4LtTWhmC6g0UBKdJwl/mi5nwjOI8R0qEkGi+HNTZtMHDc+6O qUqDmWR6FDCLCRC5KjB+7y1zEhVO3y1jXPrHhODfi7zKcG2+gepjtOwA6AjowF9v4OUnojoHQer 4XFg/dYf8GIG78iw1aptFD3oeBhO7okDcYyjF9xN4pBAeQLEShLJxPrRNvraCSoUjmc4HuA== X-Received: by 2002:a6b:6f09:: with SMTP id k9mr1146857ioc.61.1643260312856; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 21:11:52 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy49uQZ1qsHeqzYZ+9SzbcqXUpNKNfvDP1XRVSNDr3u5J5TVXs631VgJ7ftqkPAi0kJzyu0kg== X-Received: by 2002:a6b:6f09:: with SMTP id k9mr1146850ioc.61.1643260312584; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 21:11:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.241] (135-23-175-80.cpe.pppoe.ca. [135.23.175.80]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g10sm11810639ile.34.2022.01.26.21.11.51 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 26 Jan 2022 21:11:52 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3d98ce14-6c91-35c2-987b-73d0382ce39b@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 00:11:51 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.4.0 To: libc-alpha , Florian Weimer From: Carlos O'Donell Subject: glibc 2.35 - Status update: ABI freeze, and release blockers. Organization: Red Hat X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 05:12:05 -0000 Community, The glibc 2.35 release machine testing should start shortly. I'll send a distinct email about that. Please consider the ABI frozen. Any ABI changes should be OK'd with the release manager. (a) Blockers. (a.1) LD_AUDIT fixes. I'm an reviewing the LD_AUDIT fixes (series 6823). I would like to see these fixes go in. (a.2) glibc 2.34 ABI omission patch. Florian, What is the current status of the glibc 2.34 ABI omission patch? I did a review here: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2022-January/135271.html I think we should commit what you have, and look at HJ's suggestions for the future as you noted here: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2022-January/135635.html (a.3) ancillary 64-bit time timestamp conversion. Adhemerval, What is the current status of the ancillary 64-bit time timestamp conversion fixes? (b) Desirable. (b.1) Predictable ELF destructor ordering. Florian, We haven't had much time to review this, and I'd like to spend more time reviewing the changes and testing in Fedora. Would it be OK if we keep reviewing this and commit early in February? This would give us lots of time to include this in Fedora Rawhide and other rolling releases to look for issues. (b.2) pthread condvar stealing bug. I'm going to switch to reviewing this right after (a.1), and if we get a fix after the relase we can backport to the release branch, but I won't hold the release for this bug. -- Cheers, Carlos.