From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ot1-x32e.google.com (mail-ot1-x32e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32e]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 379ED385801E for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2022 19:32:36 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 379ED385801E Received: by mail-ot1-x32e.google.com with SMTP id a7-20020a9d5c87000000b005ad1467cb59so13428429oti.5 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2022 12:32:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=GpPP5DuPsZIw1N9aZa2nUgfzc0qMhzdvC+Huhrsj2gA=; b=1jgGkrgdwB1uXXkCSzKC6o9xjfswZ1hhLrKaqTyPeWjQ5j4cC51lG/W6yylXgTHf0v wKfUpVI+isqcnc0/0TC+sYYoBEcZL48BcfYbR3xCcTiBYM687oci4DW5zb/1tMOJJwlg Ehovt9KIJuVZ7YJdYddisTtilGe0lC6V5vX3RGgWF6gpW20/4hpwwy6zVXb4kW4jqbPT bWRvkCXz/3z2BujVTi7PMc4vRNbOrZcSu8GYytVkILGt9tRi6bfrhEgQMSzeDUEWt8U/ I5otTHbmUhn3lYkS89FU7+lQwCx5pHiHVlHOZvaofqCGuqNvEgN2YLX0W0rUe0yJiSNb 6twg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530Wm3NsK0GT2ZpYBnDV/vFSndUpoKVNmejF9ImdZKgDDiZNZ4ML M+SVyLegJEKcLs2soW0nNHYjPQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyFBzQlKAlvIpN8eUAxig+qvtdEGyO8euuz6QEn5w8zp0RVqMPMDJLJHMBkniFXZonrj1CHDw== X-Received: by 2002:a9d:12c1:0:b0:5b2:6181:a20f with SMTP id g59-20020a9d12c1000000b005b26181a20fmr1844356otg.242.1648582354773; Tue, 29 Mar 2022 12:32:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2804:431:c7cb:a6c0:f1e1:dcf6:8c18:df3b? ([2804:431:c7cb:a6c0:f1e1:dcf6:8c18:df3b]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id he5-20020a056870798500b000ddf4f625easm8376824oab.18.2022.03.29.12.32.33 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 29 Mar 2022 12:32:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <40fd6921-76e2-4e0c-4d05-fc5cef2df19d@linaro.org> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2022 16:32:30 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.7.0 Subject: Re: RFC: Backport architecture specific improvements to release branches Content-Language: en-US To: "H.J. Lu" , GNU C Library References: From: Adhemerval Zanella In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2022 19:32:37 -0000 On 29/03/2022 14:28, H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha wrote: > Hi, > > We'd like to backport architecture specific improvements to release branches, > similar to backports under sysdeps/x86_64/multiarch on users/intel/x86/2.34 > branch: > > https://gitlab.com/x86-glibc/glibc/-/commits/users/intel/x86/2.34 > > Any comments? I guess it should be ok, it might add some extra burden on performance bug triage if consumer use the release tarball. But it does make sense to make it as close as possible to release.