So... after all the testing gone into the release I thought I'd summarize a bit
for the list here - by sorting the glibc ports into "excellent", "good", "medium",
"bad", and "nobody even tried".

Feel free to correct my assessment... Most of the underlying info is on the
2.39 release wiki page.

Cheers,
Andreas


1. EXCELLENT 
============

aarch64
  - tests pass nearly everywhere
  - on raspi, likely timeouts

arm-linux-gnueabi (soft-float) 
arm-linux-gnueabihf (hard-float) 
  - one mystery test failure (elf/tst-align3)

loongarch64 
  - tests pass

powerpc64
powerpc64le
  - tests pass

s390x
  - tests pass

x86-64
  - tests pass

x86-64 (x32)
  - one expected failure, tests pass otherwise


2. GOOD
============

powerpc64
ppc 32bit hf
  - one failure that indicates something broken (nptl/tst-thread-exit-clobber)

riscv64
  - ~5 failures, but there may be timeouts among them

s390 (31bit)
  - two failures due to gcc breakage (gmon/tst-gmon-pie*)

sparc
  - ~5 failures (!)

x86 (32bit)
  - in general tests pass
  - there may be breakage on old hw (pentium2)


3. MEDIUM
============

ARC
 - 11 failures

hppa2.0
 - 12 failures (on ~20 year old hw! that's actually good)


4. BAD
============

Debian
 - OK not really a port :) but it seems there are some machines where
   broken Debian installs lead to massive amounts of FAIL

mips (o32)
 - actually broken right now, it seems, the tests came too late

mips (n64)
 - mostly math failures

riscv32
 - 37 failures across the board


99. NOBODY TRIED
=================

alpha

c-sky

hppa1.1

m68k

microblaze

mips64 (N32)

niosii

openrisc

superh



-- 
Andreas K. Hüttel
dilfridge@gentoo.org
Gentoo Linux developer 
(council, comrel, toolchain, base-system, perl, libreoffice)
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/User:Dilfridge