From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A8BD3844079 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 15:26:06 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 8A8BD3844079 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=foss.arm.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=Richard.Earnshaw@foss.arm.com Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 116311042; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 08:26:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.19] (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8D2783F73C; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 08:26:05 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Rename "master" branch to "main"? To: Florian Weimer , Carlos O'Donell via Libc-alpha References: <87h7usmlbr.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> From: Richard Earnshaw Message-ID: <45073d63-e1b7-12bf-dc9d-d3eb99a49984@foss.arm.com> Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2020 16:26:00 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87h7usmlbr.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3494.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2020 15:26:07 -0000 On 30/06/2020 19:59, Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha wrote: > * Carlos O'Donell via Libc-alpha: > >> My concern is that git, as a project, has not yet changed their default, > > I don't think this matters because the default branch during clone is > set by the server. The default branch set by “git init” does not really > matter to glibc development. > > Thanks, > Florian > And what about all the tracking branches people have that are currently tracking 'master'? Will they automatically switch to tracking 'main'? I doubt it. IMO this is make-work. R.