From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.FoxValley.net (mail.FoxValley.net [64.135.192.34]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 20C30385C019 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 18:04:18 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 20C30385C019 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=foxvalley.net Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=foxvalley.net Received: (qmail 15537 invoked from network) for libc-alpha@sourceware.org; 31 Jan 2022 12:03:54 -0600 Received: from 161-97-241-227.lpcnextlight.net (HELO ?192.168.1.3?) (draymond@161.97.241.227) by mail.foxvalley.net with SMTP; 31 Jan 2022 12:03:54 -0600 Message-ID: <4dccdfa8-ecde-e292-c86f-67919ac27f27@foxvalley.net> Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 11:04:16 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.0 Subject: Re: Rename "master" branch to "main" for glibc 2.35 release. Content-Language: en-US From: Dan Raymond To: libc-alpha@sourceware.org References: <77c04408-2508-350e-2f8e-db070e8d35f6@redhat.com> <18726591-4021-b408-8e0e-e63d21de232e@foxvalley.net> In-Reply-To: <18726591-4021-b408-8e0e-e63d21de232e@foxvalley.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 18:04:19 -0000 In my opinion it is not appropriate to trivialize objections over this proposal.  The burden lies on the side of those who support the proposal to provide justification for it.  If the change will cause pain for a lot of users and it is purely an aesthetic change then I vote we should reject the proposal.