From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.cs.ucla.edu (mail.cs.ucla.edu [131.179.128.66]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BD0A385842C for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2023 00:09:21 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 5BD0A385842C Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=cs.ucla.edu Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cs.ucla.edu Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F3FF3C00D18A; Tue, 3 Oct 2023 17:09:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id BWX7I8OwxXx0; Tue, 3 Oct 2023 17:09:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35D493C00D18F; Tue, 3 Oct 2023 17:09:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 mail.cs.ucla.edu 35D493C00D18F DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cs.ucla.edu; s=9D0B346E-2AEB-11ED-9476-E14B719DCE6C; t=1696378160; bh=+P7Wf29EKmWdNdG6BKrY89bQFt+liweVQq/sJhVH6ec=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:To:From; b=PlD1qRry+LmPmjr3dULCXS+X9BTDDaTDU1VMl8DVQwh1qNzFJelkg5/6j94YCiTFT p4GR0MBpltsFmMvBHKt4h4wMkFmexnpVURMvEfG3rvk2sWzt3lLqXpLOlF7DmnH1sB utovz/tufdpsuuz+lWW0C2YUUey/2VAuhXVsA/EcEVlf+xdW30P806GMrlvuA/6Knv 41OhDlPMDC7+fkGvAXxDPEdq74c38HVmzta8Z22JVwcNizIJZUWfngPgl1B9lW7jzc lReyYWuKuPxz6wCrkQ4O40vCFpxFm0RilslRYTsXbFmCOKminWq4pHd3r+xf7PPqql mar9HkJLCvFOg== X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.cs.ucla.edu Received: from mail.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id auOlg3Ws-xbY; Tue, 3 Oct 2023 17:09:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [131.179.64.200] (Penguin.CS.UCLA.EDU [131.179.64.200]) by mail.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EEA9B3C00D18A; Tue, 3 Oct 2023 17:09:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4ed6a7ae-8c71-fcdd-985f-4ab5b93cc7f0@cs.ucla.edu> Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2023 17:09:19 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.1 Subject: Re: [Action Required] glibc decision to use CTI services. Content-Language: en-US To: Carlos O'Donell , Joseph Myers , Alexandre Oliva Cc: "Ryan S. Arnold" , Maxim Kuvyrkov , Jakub Jelinek , Andreas Schwab , libc-alpha References: <15af1715-3530-7c29-7595-5abe48c18e8b@cs.ucla.edu> From: Paul Eggert Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On 9/27/23 06:49, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > CTI is the project providing the services. CTI asks the provider, LF IT, to adhere > to our requirements which include the use of only FOSS in the deployment of the > services. > > I will work with the CTI TAC and LF IT to setup documents that detail the requests > and what will be provided and I'll publish those publicly. > > We have also had requests for ensuring that we have a proper strategy for changing > providers. I will document those also. Some services are quite hard in reality > like Bugzilla or Patchwork which have databases that need duplication. Thanks, this is exactly the sort of thing I was looking for.