Status of SH for glibc 2.20?

Status of SH for glibc 2.20?

[Carlos O'Donell]

Thomas, Kaz,

It would be nice to have some SH status for glibc 2.20.

Even with the release out it is still useful for the 
machine maintainer to post their known results and
build tools used.

Thank you!

Cheers,
Carlos.

Re: Status of SH for glibc 2.20?

[Kaz Kojima]

Hi,

"Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@redhat.com> wrote:
> It would be nice to have some SH status for glibc 2.20.

2.20 can be built on sh4 without problems here.  I've got ~50 failures
with "make -k check", though almost failures aren't new.  Status looks
OK to me. (linux-2.6.32, gcc version 4.6.4, BFD assembler version 2.22.52)

Regards,
	kaz

Re: Status of SH for glibc 2.20?

[Carlos O'Donell]

On 09/08/2014 05:59 AM, Kaz Kojima wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@redhat.com> wrote:
>> It would be nice to have some SH status for glibc 2.20.
> 
> 2.20 can be built on sh4 without problems here.  I've got ~50 failures
> with "make -k check", though almost failures aren't new.  Status looks
> OK to me. (linux-2.6.32, gcc version 4.6.4, BFD assembler version 2.22.52)

Better than the 119 failures for hppa ;-)

Would one of you mind updating the SH section of the 2.20 release
page on the wiki with that information? A list of the failures would
be great.

https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Release/2.20

Cheers,
Carlos.

Re: Status of SH for glibc 2.20?

[Kaz Kojima]

"Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@redhat.com> wrote:
> Would one of you mind updating the SH section of the 2.20 release
> page on the wiki with that information? A list of the failures would
> be great.
> 
> https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Release/2.20

Ugh, I've sent a wrong report.  It seems that my sh4 machine
for the libc work is very unstable now and the processes
have been corrupt randomly.  I'll try again when that machine
works correctly.

Regards,
	kaz

Re: Status of SH for glibc 2.20?

[Kaz Kojima]

>> Would one of you mind updating the SH section of the 2.20 release
>> page on the wiki with that information? A list of the failures would
>> be great.
>> 
>> https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Release/2.20
> 
> Ugh, I've sent a wrong report.  It seems that my sh4 machine
> for the libc work is very unstable now and the processes
> have been corrupt randomly.  I'll try again when that machine
> works correctly.

I give up that machine.  I've updated the SH section of wiki
2.20 page with the result on another board.

Regards,
	kaz

Re: Status of SH for glibc 2.20?

[Carlos O'Donell]

On 09/09/2014 01:20 AM, Kaz Kojima wrote:
>>> Would one of you mind updating the SH section of the 2.20 release
>>> page on the wiki with that information? A list of the failures would
>>> be great.
>>>
>>> https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Release/2.20
>>
>> Ugh, I've sent a wrong report.  It seems that my sh4 machine
>> for the libc work is very unstable now and the processes
>> have been corrupt randomly.  I'll try again when that machine
>> works correctly.
> 
> I give up that machine.  I've updated the SH section of wiki
> 2.20 page with the result on another board.

Excellent. Thank you very much for the quick work. This way other
developers can compare.

Cheers,
Carlos.

Re: Status of SH for glibc 2.20?

[Thomas Schwinge]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 307 bytes --]

Hi!

On Sun, 7 Sep 2014 21:58:41 -0400, Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com> wrote:
> It would be nice to have some SH status for glibc 2.20.

I'm afraid I don't have access to Renesas SH hardware anymore.  Given
this, I should probably no longer be on file as a SH maintainer.


Grüße,
 Thomas

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 472 bytes --]