From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18680 invoked by alias); 8 Sep 2014 14:08:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 18669 invoked by uid 89); 8 Sep 2014 14:08:33 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Message-ID: <540DB85A.40404@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 14:08:00 -0000 From: "Carlos O'Donell" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kaz Kojima CC: libc-alpha@sourceware.org, thomas@codesourcery.com Subject: Re: Status of SH for glibc 2.20? References: <540D0D51.80201@redhat.com> <20140908.185935.388693318.kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp> In-Reply-To: <20140908.185935.388693318.kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2014-09/txt/msg00101.txt.bz2 On 09/08/2014 05:59 AM, Kaz Kojima wrote: > Hi, > > "Carlos O'Donell" wrote: >> It would be nice to have some SH status for glibc 2.20. > > 2.20 can be built on sh4 without problems here. I've got ~50 failures > with "make -k check", though almost failures aren't new. Status looks > OK to me. (linux-2.6.32, gcc version 4.6.4, BFD assembler version 2.22.52) Better than the 119 failures for hppa ;-) Would one of you mind updating the SH section of the 2.20 release page on the wiki with that information? A list of the failures would be great. https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Release/2.20 Cheers, Carlos.