From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-alpha-return-53105-listarch-libc-alpha=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 6901 invoked by alias); 26 Sep 2014 17:55:50 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-alpha-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 6890 invoked by uid 89); 26 Sep 2014 17:55:49 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
Message-ID: <5425A89F.1070103@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 17:55:00 -0000
From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
CC: Andrew Senkevich <andrew.n.senkevich@gmail.com>,
        "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>,
        libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] How to add vector math functions to Glibc
References: <CAMXFM3tjquzniXP1weqxSVFJyhXqsf2PHuyrrrmqp7K0ZzORqA@mail.gmail.com>	<CAMXFM3sGMNX1DEPAMt7qUR4UREF_xUAQjCG1OjBiZH2aoOFiPA@mail.gmail.com>	<Pine.LNX.4.64.1409181551370.31607@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>	<CAMXFM3tO7MTYCq8-YFZacdbLvR4iAab_n04AuB+rp2Phs4BvQg@mail.gmail.com>	<Pine.LNX.4.64.1409242011260.7597@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>	<CAMXFM3tqiqUNuSU2KXvAFM-QescX3+6xUO9=z5X0Ac6C9qJ7zg@mail.gmail.com>	<CAMe9rOq7bZHb8R=opUzSmAMGWjLpX21mR=Sx96cuBph=TTtDXA@mail.gmail.com>	<54246CB5.7020908@redhat.com>	<CAMe9rOoLmJ2jHWmERoB0M83WNKovJOgh0--Kquw9O86A1tPU0g@mail.gmail.com>	<5424733D.6010305@redhat.com>	<CAMe9rOpacze055qyBFzz3M-b-GNtXCqZzMmkScBL9a94zVj28g@mail.gmail.com>	<54247FAB.6050002@redhat.com>	<CAMe9rOq78Sey2HMHBdJNY=+E5NuHxDDhhZ=+0QJX5MTw6KLcBg@mail.gmail.com>	<54258AD4.7000604@redhat.com> <CAMe9rOqgy6DB9mAEYHaNCZN9-m8aiSWrwAgZ=AXAcbYr8+KD7Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMe9rOqgy6DB9mAEYHaNCZN9-m8aiSWrwAgZ=AXAcbYr8+KD7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SW-Source: 2014-09/txt/msg00602.txt.bz2

On 09/26/2014 12:08 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> I think this chioce may actually be larger than just Intel.
>>
>> For example IBM, and particularly their Power vector math
>> functions were explained to me as being callable directly
>> by developers. Thus Power might want libmvec.so in glibc?
> 
> Does Power have the same API as x86?  If not, how will they
> be used by programmers?

Power does not have the same API.

I expect that David Edhelson was talking about these:
http://pic.dhe.ibm.com/infocenter/compbg/v121v141/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.ibm.xlcpp121.bg.doc%2Fproguide%2Fvector.html

Though I haven't verified.

> Again, we need to decide
> 
> 1. Who is the main user.

Normal developers.

> 2. How it is used by the main user.

They call those functions.

> 3. What is the impact on the programmers.

If the functions are in glibc, we can deploy them independent
of compiler.

> If we put it in GLIBC, we should have a API with a generic
> implementation and each target can have optimized implementation.

I disagree.

Each target will likely have two APIs:

(a) The legacy API supported for compatibility with existing
    applications following the existing published APIs.
    e.g. IBM and Intel vector functions.

(b) A generic GNU implemetnation that all targets can have.

We aren't even talking about (b) yet.

Cheers,
Carlos.