Re: [PATCH] Fix missing err declaration in __pthread_initialize_minimal_internal

["Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@redhat.com>]

On 05/26/2015 12:42 PM, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> On Sat, 2015-05-23 at 23:04 -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> 
>> Why isn't this inside the inner ifdef?
>>
>>>  #ifdef __NR_set_robust_list
>>>    pd->robust_head.futex_offset = (offsetof (pthread_mutex_t, __data.__lock)
>>>  				  - offsetof (pthread_mutex_t,
>>
>> As Florian mentioned to Raj, the definition of the err decl should
>> be in the same scope as the syscall that uses it.
>>
>> Did I miss something?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Carlos.
> 
> This patch is no longer needed due to Roland's patch but the reason I
> didn't put INTERNAL_SYSCALL_DECL in the same scope as INTERNAL_SYSCALL
> was because there was multiple INTERNAL_SYSCALL calls in
> __pthread_initialize_minimal_internal and I wanted one
> INTERNAL_SYSCALL_DECL to cover them all.  That was basically what we had
> before.  I guess the right way (and what Roland checked in) is to have
> one INTERNAL_SYSCALL_DECL for each scope with an INTERNAL_SYSCALL and if
> you have two INTERNAL_SYSCALL's in different ifdefs but in the same C
> scope then use brackets to make different scopes so you can have a
> INTERNAL_SYSCALL_DECL with each INTERNAL_SYSCALL.
> 
> I.e. do not do this:
> 
> INTERNAL_SYSCALL_DECL
> #if A
> INTERNAL_SYSCALL()
> #endif
> #if B
> INTERNAL_SYSCALL()
> #endif
> 
> 
> but instead do this:
> 
> 
> #if A
> {
>   INTERNAL_SYSCALL_DECL
>   INTERNAL_SYSCALL()
> }
> #endif
> #if B
> {
>   INTERNAL_SYSCALL_DECL
>   INTERNAL_SYSCALL()
> }
> #endif

Agreed. I did see later that Roland checked in a solution.

Cheers,
Carlos.