From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-alpha-return-61604-listarch-libc-alpha=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 23501 invoked by alias); 4 Aug 2015 14:30:30 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-alpha-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 23449 invoked by uid 89); 4 Aug 2015 14:30:26 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
Message-ID: <55C0CC7B.2010208@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 14:30:00 -0000
From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
CC: Jochen Hein <jochen@jochen.org>, libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: New template for 'libc' made available
References: <E1ZL4aK-0002H2-FJ@duik.vrijschrift.org> <87bnepigsb.fsf@echidna.jochen.org> <alpine.DEB.2.10.1508031704500.22507@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <55BFB7DC.3090403@redhat.com> <alpine.DEB.2.10.1508032033240.14394@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1508032033240.14394@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2015-08/txt/msg00054.txt.bz2

On 08/03/2015 04:34 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Aug 2015, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> 
>>               dbg_log (_("monitored file `%s` was %s, removing watch"),
>> -                      finfo->fname, moved ? "moved" : "deleted");
>> +                      finfo->fname, moved ? _("moved") : _("deleted"));
> 
> No, you need to have two completely separate format strings, one with 
> "moved" and one with "deleted", each marked for translation, in case the 
> translation of the word affects the rest of the sentence or the word needs 
> translating differently in different calls to dbg_log.

Thanks. I'll fix this in 2.23 then.

Cheers,
Carlos.