From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-alpha-return-68361-listarch-libc-alpha=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 50787 invoked by alias); 25 Mar 2016 16:41:53 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-alpha-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 50775 invoked by uid 89); 25 Mar 2016 16:41:53 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=25032016, 2016-03-25, synchronize
X-HELO: mail-qk0-f176.google.com
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
         :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=lZcdmjpAsR+n6Fl2JEWrV6vfujs7xO+k5XgQNne8lIk=;
        b=KmOgDrxu/mG/gFs3bR1ej3zfPPWHOGmSyuZd9xosyyQ3E/cQnsiNcCzpgxxVK93DPr
         CZ5QIp3mwMb68qx88Kpv0HiclZyep6DnjcWhTz5xNcfSmVniEvCaMrxKc9tlQyYHnUuY
         9IRHSED0cLVgEuOOO3ESvXFZTk09Dcs3NIHDrs0aigD26V1k6l2rNpt+b5lXm4h3AuBC
         NJpvRPRtgyWj9DJrddzG0HG8zoIeKb6pqdqci93bdCoA+kukFERW8GC68zZUu6/ILAjd
         B8ODY8daBvEqOVB3Ch68jJbR62EsQFsk2Sl0HEHAiR3YV7FR3yszeAc7B7FIR1HIMN58
         XfPw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLYP0mc6sb6PZQHFX0tRW6wJqcYhfbaXRhlju7xHfVO+AV7dF+c9egf7OjKsC19iMFG
X-Received: by 10.129.145.79 with SMTP id i76mr7602222ywg.40.1458924100863;
        Fri, 25 Mar 2016 09:41:40 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Synchronize <sys/personality.h> with kernel headers
To: libc-alpha@sourceware.org
References: <1458844558-15949-1-git-send-email-aurelien@aurel32.net>
 <56F55F2B.4070108@linaro.org> <20160325161940.GC14337@aurel32.net>
From: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <56F56A42.2000909@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2016 16:41:00 -0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160325161940.GC14337@aurel32.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2016-03/txt/msg00641.txt.bz2



On 25-03-2016 13:19, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2016-03-25 12:54, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
>> LGTM. I wonder if you should include PER_CLEAR_ON_SETID as well, thoughts? 
> 
> I don't really know either. It is define upstream as a macro and not an
> enum, I don't really know why.
> 
> Looking at codesearch.debian.net it doesn't seem to be use by userland,
> contrary to the three others (though in very few places). So I would
> rather got for not including it for now.
> 

Fair enough then.