From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 86235 invoked by alias); 2 May 2016 08:01:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 86213 invoked by uid 89); 2 May 2016 08:01:58 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:555 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Subject: Re: nss_files testing To: libc-alpha@sourceware.org References: <57111263.7030205@redhat.com> From: Florian Weimer Message-ID: <57270972.1050307@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 02 May 2016 08:01:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <57111263.7030205@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-05/txt/msg00002.txt.bz2 On 04/15/2016 06:10 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: > Some things need cleanup. I want to submit this for real once I have > some experience with adding nss_db support (which will reuse the chroot > setup code from tst-nss-files-aux, moving it to tst-nss-files). Longer > term, this approach should also work for testing nscd. I wonder if these tests have value as-is. The existing framework was certainly helpful for writing a new test to check my getnameinfo changes. Should I check them in (and XFAIL the enumeration test)? Florian