From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=jG9n=7X=yandex.ru=stsp2@sourceware.org>
Received: from forward500c.mail.yandex.net (forward500c.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:c03:500:1:45:d181:d500])
	by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 622C83858D28
	for <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>; Fri, 31 Mar 2023 18:47:14 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 622C83858D28
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=yandex.ru
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=yandex.ru
Received: from mail-nwsmtp-smtp-production-canary-88.sas.yp-c.yandex.net (mail-nwsmtp-smtp-production-canary-88.sas.yp-c.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:c14:7296:0:640:126f:0])
	by forward500c.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id D67EB5EFF4;
	Fri, 31 Mar 2023 21:47:11 +0300 (MSK)
Received: by mail-nwsmtp-smtp-production-canary-88.sas.yp-c.yandex.net (smtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id 9lP7fZGDdiE0-u2uZdSFV;
	Fri, 31 Mar 2023 21:47:11 +0300
X-Yandex-Fwd: 1
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1680288431;
	bh=T0C+5KbyYdDbAK8xg9bmzMynA5HdoH3r/7RaM6KI1NQ=;
	h=In-Reply-To:From:Date:References:To:Subject:Message-ID;
	b=UdxOQ0ZyuWTi0259v9dd8yeSVuMOQiy1EoGDT+zWyoJDw4ItH4s/8C3blF7VB1yJJ
	 OI2q8sIIouKAhi+4rAsb53S9psMcMCqDGI+CZaPuQ9+3XynfQY3M3itosmo1DevrQb
	 ZAhkH5fhSEuqWgDVu5Vx5owTkh9n5QRqvtLBn718=
Authentication-Results: mail-nwsmtp-smtp-production-canary-88.sas.yp-c.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.ru
Message-ID: <592021ae-8f69-d411-c278-054ca003ef47@yandex.ru>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2023 23:47:08 +0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.7.1
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/13] implement dlmem() function
Content-Language: en-US
To: Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>,
 Adhemerval Zanella Netto <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>,
 libc-alpha@sourceware.org, janderson@rice.edu,
 Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>, Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
References: <20230318165110.3672749-1-stsp2@yandex.ru>
 <a08c9579-e25a-298c-6cd2-d355d32fa7e7@linaro.org>
 <e19ed6a5-67c4-f6c4-9392-b162ffb41209@yandex.ru> <ZCbP+K63XLFDxYYE@arm.com>
 <2f3a10fa-4f79-7f9a-6407-d227dbf31935@yandex.ru> <ZCcUleo68cmjAHoI@arm.com>
From: stsp <stsp2@yandex.ru>
In-Reply-To: <ZCcUleo68cmjAHoI@arm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,BODY_8BITS,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org
List-Id: <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>


31.03.2023 22:12, Szabolcs Nagy пишет:
> your dlmem design it passes down a user callback that runs
> under dynamic linker locks to map segments.
Oh, I missed that sentence initially.
No, its not to map segments.
Its to do the single initial mmap() only.
The segments are of course all mapped
by the loader internally.
Which is why this callback is optional and
should almost never be used.

Does this clarification help?

Btw, I am thankful to you for reading an
API description. Not too many people did
that. Carlos and Jonathon definitely did,
so I am thankful to them as well.