From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-alpha-return-95863-listarch-libc-alpha=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 119006 invoked by alias); 17 Sep 2018 12:12:25 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-alpha-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 118994 invoked by uid 89); 17 Sep 2018 12:12:24 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:381
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] posix: Add internal symbols for posix_spawn interface
To: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>,
 libc-alpha@sourceware.org
References: <20180915151622.17789-1-adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <5afa00e6-6152-c88e-66a1-d454d071fa96@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2018 12:12:00 -0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20180915151622.17789-1-adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2018-09/txt/msg00232.txt.bz2

On 09/15/2018 05:16 PM, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
> +__typeof (posix_spawn) __posix_spawn;
> +libc_hidden_proto (__posix_spawn)

I think libc_hidden_proto without a GLIBC_PRIVATE export doesn't make 
much sense.  Why can't you use attribute_hidden here, like for the other 
new function symbols?

Thanks,
Florian