From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ot1-x330.google.com (mail-ot1-x330.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::330]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99BEF3858D39 for ; Mon, 3 Apr 2023 12:29:53 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 99BEF3858D39 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linaro.org Received: by mail-ot1-x330.google.com with SMTP id d22-20020a9d5e16000000b0069b5252ced7so15493333oti.13 for ; Mon, 03 Apr 2023 05:29:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; t=1680524993; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:organization:from:references :to:content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=r/XPOsnmPVXeN2munIsTqoja9CnJaVhuRL0V+9v2rjU=; b=UDWWD5bkrCmK+fHDcdux16pV+IM8u2e8xRNRhvtQ1Zds9tfOE+MPaVoJ9y/f4sNUwh j3TXIh72fUyDmL/yMfbZ0R4WTamjx18Cj4NOkzgDU8kC9uJLhsihtalruDuey2qHGQF9 OgDOn28WkN0riOfeKUH/PVlfWw5s5fBJsdhiH9qEqkHWPX7IZ1MaK65+VlQ6l+TtF7O/ KDdkxilGHdwrPWkgBlC8Xam/745yFVeH1+gV9dp5Yu4LMHKpWjVMjqj8PmetuYgz971x 6V03oOEVO5f1Hcc7g2GQfRLifhz2tD4kzE6A8izMNhb0bs0R2kh/zCaWv+ph1R3dGyKg N4Kw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1680524993; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:organization:from:references :to:content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=r/XPOsnmPVXeN2munIsTqoja9CnJaVhuRL0V+9v2rjU=; b=rxmDXJifg3f/8Ad1Jde2ddDLuAzAduQH0pIMlmbf18S5E321SldXmOhr1VJuYyUUGe v8HqlbFRvNTTUjEqLKWkJLm4nv9JDtLlDpD2wHq3nz75TLo45tWJ/UhcdCldiXHRZdoI SuY6bUr3iL4aN1MzqRSuPPKt63o5EQRd0ZKsmG3MIVt67eNqfWlFwfsJnbBV39Fg3LXK 8VqAfrKD5I8Iq3gbLInoHkJd/eKou7BAoBZoQ/BY5xpTIlmWLHftoAGamo2ekd2dE1J5 0M+9rFC9iFI/y04cZ49I22wCcL6FL7YS0/OKhJWrk1zm1EsXs0qaqKrJYu4ycJZbYE1u 242Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKW2PgQT3p0f5eoT6RakYEPK0WAHWhvVcXiuVpX1+EVSM2nXIn4x 95iZhEfPvae0vTjUMwP90CS9dSe7IYP1ZPMRmwTMLw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set/YWVwR8bbzE0uTOaeSu84yebAVE9Ez4rmxudZG4R2mb2Q8RdwyeDhuNBVE5xLS+bF7LW60gA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:12d6:b0:68b:dd8b:6cd with SMTP id a22-20020a05683012d600b0068bdd8b06cdmr17011512otq.7.1680524992842; Mon, 03 Apr 2023 05:29:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2804:1b3:a7c1:e5a5:1dbf:5ab5:fa44:f99c? ([2804:1b3:a7c1:e5a5:1dbf:5ab5:fa44:f99c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b2-20020a9d6b82000000b006a32eb9e0dfsm2021078otq.67.2023.04.03.05.29.51 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 03 Apr 2023 05:29:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5c13bb4b-0e9f-5f46-3955-a651f5f34ec6@linaro.org> Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2023 09:29:49 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.9.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: Modify some member names in mcontext_t and ucontext_t structs to align them with the kernel. Content-Language: en-US To: caiyinyu , libc-alpha@sourceware.org References: <20230403025143.2882449-1-caiyinyu@loongson.cn> From: Adhemerval Zanella Netto Organization: Linaro In-Reply-To: <20230403025143.2882449-1-caiyinyu@loongson.cn> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On 02/04/23 23:51, caiyinyu wrote: > During the construction of the LoongArch Alpine system, > we found that there is an inconsistency in the member > names of mcontext_t and ucontext_t between musl and glibc, > which can cause compilation errors. After testing, we have > decided to modify some member names. > > This patch will be backported to glibc versions 2.36 and 2.37. You can't do it without breaking the API and I don't think we should allow the precedence. Afaik loongarch is not yet on musl, so why can't you mimic what loongarch already defined in glibc on musl?